AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study analyzes the economic impact of invasive alien species (IAS) in aquatic ecosystems, revealing that global costs amount to at least US$345 billion, primarily from invertebrates and concentrated in North America and Asia.
  • - It highlights significant knowledge gaps in cost reporting for aquatic IAS, especially in regions like Africa and parts of Asia, showing that many countries have not provided any documented economic impacts.
  • - The costs associated with aquatic IAS have surged in recent years, with an alarming increase noted in 2020, and the study calls for better reporting and proactive management efforts to address these financial impacts.

Article Abstract

Much research effort has been invested in understanding ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) across ecosystems and taxonomic groups, but empirical studies about economic effects lack synthesis. Using a comprehensive global database, we determine patterns and trends in economic costs of aquatic IAS by examining: (i) the distribution of these costs across taxa, geographic regions and cost types; (ii) the temporal dynamics of global costs; and (iii) knowledge gaps, especially compared to terrestrial IAS. Based on the costs recorded from the existing literature, the global cost of aquatic IAS conservatively summed to US$345 billion, with the majority attributed to invertebrates (62%), followed by vertebrates (28%), then plants (6%). The largest costs were reported in North America (48%) and Asia (13%), and were principally a result of resource damages (74%); only 6% of recorded costs were from management. The magnitude and number of reported costs were highest in the United States of America and for semi-aquatic taxa. Many countries and known aquatic alien species had no reported costs, especially in Africa and Asia. Accordingly, a network analysis revealed limited connectivity among countries, indicating disparate cost reporting. Aquatic IAS costs have increased in recent decades by several orders of magnitude, reaching at least US$23 billion in 2020. Costs are likely considerably underrepresented compared to terrestrial IAS; only 5% of reported costs were from aquatic species, despite 26% of known invaders being aquatic. Additionally, only 1% of aquatic invasion costs were from marine species. Costs of aquatic IAS are thus substantial, but likely underreported. Costs have increased over time and are expected to continue rising with future invasions. We urge increased and improved cost reporting by managers, practitioners and researchers to reduce knowledge gaps. Few costs are proactive investments; increased management spending is urgently needed to prevent and limit current and future aquatic IAS damages.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145238DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aquatic ias
20
costs
16
costs aquatic
16
alien species
12
reported costs
12
aquatic
10
economic costs
8
invasive alien
8
ias
8
knowledge gaps
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!