AI Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of adding upper endoscopy to colonoscopy for patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test, particularly in detecting upper digestive lesions.
- Data was analyzed from 100 patients who had both procedures, revealing a 58% incidence of upper digestive lesions, including infections and precancerous conditions.
- Findings from the upper endoscopy influenced patient management in 44% of cases, suggesting it may be beneficial for screening, but further research is needed to confirm efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Article Abstract
Background And Aims: The French colorectal cancer screening program is based on a fecal immunochemical test, followed by colonoscopy in case of positivity. The benefit of adding a concomitant upper endoscopy to detect upper digestive lesions (precancerous or others) is still debated. Our aim was to evaluate the frequency of upper digestive lesions detected by upper endoscopy performed concomitantly with colonoscopy following a positive fecal immunochemical test, and their impact on the patients' management (i.e., surveillance, medical treatment, endoscopic or surgical procedure).
Methods: Data of all the patients who consulted for a positive test between May 2016 and May 2019 in our center, and for whom concomitant upper endoscopy and colonoscopy were performed, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with significant history of upper gastrointestinal diseases or with current gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded.
Results: One hundred patients were included [median age (min-max): 62 (50-75), men 64%]. Macroscopic and/or microscopic upper digestive lesions were found in 58 of them (58%): Helicobacter pylori infection in 17 patients, gastric precancerous lesions in 9 patients (chronic atrophic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia, n=8, low grade dysplasia, n=1), Barrett's esophagus requiring surveillance in 4 patients, and 1 duodenal adenoma with low-grade dysplasia. In 44 patients (44%), the upper endoscopy findings had an impact on patients' management, with no significant difference between the groups with positive (CRC or advanced adenoma)- or negative (any other lesions or normal) colonoscopy.
Conclusion: A systematic upper endoscopy combined with colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical test could represent an efficient strategy for upper digestive lesions screening in France. Further studies are necessary to confirm these results and to evaluate cost-effectiveness of this approach.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2020.07.006 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Lateral center-edge angle in femoroacetabular impingement: from the sourcil or the rim of the acetabulum?
Medicine (Baltimore)
November 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
The correlation between clinical outcomes and preoperative/postoperative measures of the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) will help establish the cutoff values for this measurement and determine whether to obtain it from the lateral acetabular rim (LCEAR) or the lateral end of the sourcil (LCEAS). The hypothesis was that the LCEAS would be more sensitive than the LCEAR. An upper cutoff value of LCEA could predict better functional outcomes in FAI patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFQuality Indicators for Upper GI Endoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Factors Associated with Clinically Significant Extrinsic Compression on Gastroduodenal Endoscopy.
Dig Dis Sci
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Background: Although clinicians frequently encounter incidentally detected gastroduodenal extrinsic compressive lesions (GDECLs) on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE), the optimal management approach for GDECLs has not been fully established. This study aimed to stratify and identify important factors associated with clinically significant GDECLs that require regular follow-up or further treatment.
Methods: Between June 2007 and December 2015, a total of 73 patients with suspected GDECLs on UGE at Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong were identified and studied retrospectively.
Short Versus Standard Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Dig Dis Sci
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Background And Aims: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become the treatment of choice for achalasia. However, the impact of myotomy length on POEM outcomes remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of short versus standard-length myotomy in achalasia patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImpact of depth of body cavity at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on open and laparoscopic liver resection of segment 7.
Langenbecks Arch Surg
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University, Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Purpose: The impact of body-cavity depth on open (OLR) and laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of segment 7 remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the influence of body-cavity depth at the upper-right portion of the abdomen on LLR and OLR of segment 7.
Methods: In total, 101 patients who underwent segment-7 liver resection over 2010-2023 were included.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!