Background: Lung cancer is the greatest cause of cancer mortality in the United States, necessitating ongoing improvements in current treatment techniques. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the interaction between a photosensitizer, light, and oxygen. The resulting release of reactive oxygen species causes tumor necrosis. It has been used as an endoscopic technique for the palliation of lung cancer. Porfimer sodium (Photofrin) is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved photosensitizer for PDT but has limited depth of penetration and produces prolonged skin phototoxicity. Multiple newer photosensitizers are in development, including PS785. The effectiveness of PS785 was compared with porfimer sodium in the treatment of human lung cancer xenografts in mice.

Methods: Human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) xenografts were established in severe combined immunodeficient mice and grouped into small (3-5 mm) and large tumors (6-10 mm). PS785 or porfimer sodium was administered intravenously, and PDT was executed at 24, 48, or 72 h after injection. The primary endpoint was the delay of tumor regrowth after PDT.

Results: Porfimer sodium and PS785 produced statistically similar delays of tumor regrowth after PDT when small tumors were treated at 24 and 48 h. At 72 h, PS785 performed better in small tumors. However, for large tumors, PS785 produced no delay in tumor regrowth at any time point.

Conclusions: PS785 and porfimer sodium were able to effectively treat NSCLC to a depth of ≤5 mm. However, porfimer sodium was more effective in treating NSCLC tumors to a depth of 6-10 mm. Further efforts are required to produce photosensitizers that will facilitate PDT of larger tumors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.067DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

porfimer sodium
28
lung cancer
20
tumor regrowth
12
ps785
8
cancer xenografts
8
large tumors
8
ps785 porfimer
8
delay tumor
8
ps785 produced
8
small tumors
8

Similar Publications

Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy on treatment response and survival in patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review.

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther

August 2024

Univ Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Pólo III - Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal; Univ Coimbra, Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Pólo III - Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal; Univ Coimbra, Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), Rua Larga, Coimbra, 3004-504, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, 3004-561, Portugal. Electronic address:

Background: This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Methods: Clinical studies on recurrent OSCC treated with PDT alone were included. Combined treatment strategies were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Significance: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an established cancer treatment utilizing light-activated photosensitizers (PS). Effective treatment hinges on the PDT dose-dependent on PS concentration and light fluence-delivered over time. We introduce an innovative eight-channel PDT dose dosimetry system capable of concurrently measuring light fluence and PS concentration during treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging and less invasive treatment modality for various types of cancer. This review provides an overview of recent trends in PDT research, ranging from basic research to ongoing clinical trials, focusing on different cancer types. Lung cancer, head and neck cancer, non-melanoma skin cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer are discussed in this context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current treatment for prostate cancer is dependent on the stages of the cancer, recurrence, and genetic factors. Treatment varies from active surveillance or watchful waiting to prostatectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy in combination or alone. Although radical prostate cancer therapy reduces the advancement of the disease and its mortality, the increased disease treatment associated morbidity, erectile dysfunction, and incontinence affect the quality of life of cancer survivors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!