AI Article Synopsis

  • * Different testing methods for detecting the CXCR4 S338X variant may lead to inconsistent results in clinical trials, complicating treatment strategies.
  • * The study found that while targeted next-generation sequencing often missed CXCR4 mutations, combining allele-specific PCR with CD19 cell selection greatly improved detection accuracy, although sensitivity was reduced in cases with low bone marrow involvement and varied mutation presence.

Article Abstract

CXCR4 mutations impact disease presentation and treatment outcomes in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM). Non-uniform testing for CXCR4 mutations may account for discordant findings in WM clinical trials. We compared two approaches used in these trials for detection of the most common CXCR4 (S338X) variant: targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) using unselected bone marrow (BM) samples, and combined allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) and Sanger sequencing with unselected and CD19-selected BM samples. Our findings showed that targeted NGS frequently yielded false-negative results. Both CD19 selection and AS-PCR markedly improved detection of CXCR4 mutations. Sensitivity was adversely impacted by low BM involvement and CXCR4 mutation clonality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9113056PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.17385DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cxcr4 mutations
12
bone marrow
8
next-generation sequencing
8
waldenström macroglobulinaemia
8
cxcr4
6
marrow involvement
4
involvement subclonal
4
subclonal diversity
4
diversity impairs
4
impairs detection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!