A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Development and validation of an autophagy-related prognostic signature in esophageal cancer. | LitMetric

Background: Autophagy has a dual function in cancer, and its role in carcinogenesis of the esophagus remains poorly understood. In the present study, we explored the prognostic value of autophagy in esophageal cancer (ESCA), one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide.

Methods: Using ESCA RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) data from 158 primary patients with ESCA, including esophageal adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for this study. We obtained differentially expressed autophagy-related genes (ARGs) by the "limma" package of R. The Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome (KEGG) analyses unveiled several fundamental signaling pathways associated with the differentially expressed ARGs in ESCA. Univariate Cox regression analyses were used to estimate associations between ARGs and overall survival (OS) in the TCGA ESCA cohort. A Cox proportional hazards model (iteration =1,000) with a lasso penalty was used to create the optimal multiple-gene prognostic signature utilizing an R package called "glmnet".

Results: A prognostic signature was constructed with four ARGs (, , and ) in the training set, which significantly divided ESCA patients into high- and low-risk groups in terms of OS [hazard ratio (HR) =1.508, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.201-1.894, P<0.001]. In the testing set, the risk score remained an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analyses (HR =1.572, 95% CI: 1.096-2.257, P=0.014). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) predicting 1-year survival showed a better predictive power for the prediction model. The AUC in training and testing cohorts were 0.746 and 0.691, respectively. Therefore, the prognostic signature of the four ARGs was successfully validated in the independent cohort.

Conclusions: The prognostic signature may be an independent predictor of survival for ESCA patients. The prognostic nomogram may improve the prediction of individualized outcome. This study also highlights the importance of autophagy in the outcomes of patients with ESCA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944288PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-4541DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prognostic signature
12
esophageal cancer
8
differentially expressed
8
esca
6
development validation
4
validation autophagy-related
4
prognostic
4
autophagy-related prognostic
4
esophageal
4
signature esophageal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!