Effectiveness and healthcare costs of eribulin versus capecitabine among metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan.

Breast

Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Research Center for Pharmacoeconomics, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Published: June 2021

Objective: To compare the real-world effectiveness and costs of eribulin to those of capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Methods: This study extracted data from the Health and Welfare Database in Taiwan to identify MBC patients, and then eribulin and capecitabine users were matched at a 1:1 ratio by age, residential region, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and molecular subtype of BC cell. The overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Healthcare utilization and costs between the two groups were compared.

Results: A total of 24,550 MBC patients were identified, and 298 patients were enrolled in each group after matching. The median OS was 11.8 months for eribulin (95%CI: 11.5-13.5 months) and 15.2 months for capecitabine (95%CI: 15.3-17.9 months; HR = 1.7, p < 0.0001). The median TTD was 4.0 months for eribulin and 6.6 months for capecitabine (HR = 1.6; p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two groups in patients with >4 prior chemotherapy agents (OS: HR 1.1, 95%CI 0.8-1.5; TTD: HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.9-1.7). The total healthcare costs per patient during the treatment period were NT$580,523.8 for eribulin versus NT$497,223.8 for capecitabine (p < 0.0001), and total medication costs were NT$438,335.8 and NT$348,438.4 (p < 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusion: Although eribulin showed an attenuated effect in the real-world setting in Taiwan, it may serve as an alternative for capecitabine in a heavy pretreated population. The total healthcare and medication costs were found to be higher with eribulin treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7972983PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.02.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

costs eribulin
8
metastatic breast
8
breast cancer
8
eribulin capecitabine
8
mbc patients
8
patients
5
effectiveness healthcare
4
healthcare costs
4
eribulin
4
eribulin versus
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: This study evaluated treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in real-world clinical settings in Japan.

Methods: The treatment patterns, time to next treatment or death (TTNTD), time to treatment discontinuation, adverse events of interest, and medical costs of treating patients with mTNBC in first-, second-, and third-line settings were investigated using data of patients meeting the inclusion criteria between January 2017 and March 2022 in a Japanese medical claims database. The treatment regimens for mTNBC were defined according to the Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-20% of breast cancer cases, leading to increased healthcare costs that necessitate health-economic evaluations to assess treatment options.
  • The research analyzed the cost-benefit ratio of approved TNBC treatments in Germany using an efficiency frontier approach, focusing on costs and clinical benefits like median overall survival (mOS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
  • Findings showed that vinorelbine is the most cost-effective treatment, followed by sacituzumab-govitecan, with specific data on treatment costs and overall survival metrics reported for each therapy, guiding healthcare decision-makers in treatment choices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Treatments for endocrine-refractory or triple-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) are modestly effective at prolonging life and improving quality of life but can be extremely expensive. Given these tradeoffs in quality of life and cost, the optimal choice of treatment sequencing is unclear. Cost-effectiveness analysis can explicitly quantify such tradeoffs, enabling more informed decision making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Breast cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies. The aim of the article is to analyse the cost-utility ratio and budgetary impact of talazoparib treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic gBRCA + breast cancer from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Analyses were based on the EMBRACA clinical trial and the model was constructed according to "partitioned survival analysis".

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effectiveness and healthcare costs of eribulin versus capecitabine among metastatic breast cancer patients in Taiwan.

Breast

June 2021

Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Research Center for Pharmacoeconomics, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:

Objective: To compare the real-world effectiveness and costs of eribulin to those of capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Methods: This study extracted data from the Health and Welfare Database in Taiwan to identify MBC patients, and then eribulin and capecitabine users were matched at a 1:1 ratio by age, residential region, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and molecular subtype of BC cell. The overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!