"Indeterminate" UroVysion Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results.

Am J Clin Pathol

Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Published: August 2021

Objectives: UroVysion cases with one to three abnormal cells that do not meet the threshold for positivity may be better classified as "indeterminate." The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and clinical significance of these indeterminate UroVysion results.

Methods: The UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results over a 4-year period in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up of the initial UroVysion cases, including urine cytology or bladder biopsy performed within 12 months of the initial diagnosis of the result, was obtained from pathology reports.

Results: A significant fraction (178 of 1,907, 9.3%) of the UroVysion cases had indeterminate results. Overall, the subsequent malignancy rate of the group with indeterminate UroVysion results (14 of 59, 23.7%) was higher than the group with normal results (48 of 319, 15.0%), although the difference was not significant (P = .124). For patients without a history of urinary tract neoplasm, the subsequent malignancy rate in the group with indeterminate results (7 of 18, 38.9%) was significantly higher than the group with normal results (16 of 103, 15.5%) (P = .044).

Conclusions: Our results support that indeterminate UroVysion FISH result may warrant closer clinical follow-up in patients without a history of urinary tract neoplasm. We suggest reporting these cases as "aneusomy of undetermined significance."

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa254DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

urovysion cases
12
indeterminate urovysion
12
urovysion fluorescence
8
fluorescence situ
8
situ hybridization
8
subsequent malignancy
8
malignancy rate
8
rate group
8
group indeterminate
8
higher group
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Urinary cytology is a key diagnostic tool for evaluating suspected urinary tract carcinoma, primarily high-grade urothelial carcinoma. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), introduced in 2016, aimed to standardize reporting, though challenges with subjectivity and variability in diagnosing Atypical Urothelial Cells (AUCs) persist.

Methods: This retrospective study explored the correlation between cytomorphological features in "atypical" diagnosis and UroVysion fluorescence hybridization (U-FISH) results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The atypical urothelial cell (AUC) category in The Paris System (TPS) in urine cytology (UrCy) is a challenging area. This study aimed to evaluate the UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (U-FISH) assay in predicting the outcome of AUC. Additionally, we explored the association of abnormal U-FISH results in high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) concerning muscularis propria invasion (MPI).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study evaluates the efficacy of Acu-URO17, a highly sensitive and specific immunocytochemistry (ICC) test targeting Keratin 17, in comparison to urine cytology and UroVysion™ fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detecting bladder cancer cells in voided urine specimens.

Methods: Acupath conducted a large-scale comparison study using 2378 voided urine specimens. Acu-URO17, urine cytology and UroVysion™ FISH were performed on these specimens according to standardized protocols.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The Paris System (TPS) provides a uniform reporting system of urine cytology based on well-defined cytologic criteria. Due to their rarity, there are limited data on the utility of TPS in upper urinary tract (UUT) lesions and follow-up histology of cases with abnormal cytology. We aimed to evaluate the utility of TPS for UUT lesions by correlating the cytologic diagnoses using TPS criteria with subsequent histology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aims to compare the technical performance of Abbott's UroVysion and Biocare's CytoFISH urine cytology probe panel and position the CytoFISH probe panel as an alternative to UroVysion. The CytoFISH probe panel was developed based on clinically sensitive chromosomes found to be amplified in bladder cancers, as well as a locus-specific probe also seen to be amplified in bladder tumors. After extensive testing comparing CytoFISH to UroVysion, we present here our findings for the two assays.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!