Objectives: We aimed to assess the value of liver biopsy in the evaluation of abnormal liver tests.

Methods: We analyzed consecutive liver biopsy specimens performed for evaluation of unexplained abnormal liver tests from 2014 to 2018. Diagnoses were categorized histologically and clinically. We determined whether histologic examination led to a specific diagnosis and whether prebiopsy laboratory variables predicted the underlying etiology.

Results: Among the 383 liver biopsy specimens included, chronic hepatitis was the most common histologic (25%) and clinical (17%) diagnosis. Liver biopsy led to a clinical diagnosis in 87% of patients. The most likely clinical diagnoses were autoimmune hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and drug-induced liver injury (38, 33, and 32 patients, respectively). Using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, we found that liver tests were not predictive of a specific diagnosis. In patients with no history of liver disease or clinical features of portal hypertension, biopsy specimens revealed histologic cirrhosis in 5% of patients.

Conclusions: Histopathologic diagnoses were made in 85% of patients undergoing liver biopsy for investigation of unexplained liver tests, leading to a clinical diagnosis in 87% of patients. However, neither liver tests themselves nor their patterns were useful in predicting histologic or clinical diagnoses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8259499PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa225DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver biopsy
24
liver tests
16
liver
15
liver disease
12
abnormal liver
12
biopsy specimens
12
biopsy evaluation
8
specific diagnosis
8
clinical diagnosis
8
diagnosis 87%
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!