Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment of heart failure (HF) with ventricular dyssynchrony, but not all patients respond to a similar extent. We investigated the efficacy and safety of exercise training (ET) in patients without response to CRT. Thirty-four patients who participated in a 3-month ET program and underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and after the program were divided into 17 responders and 17 non-responders based on echocardiographic response criteria: either an increase in ejection fraction (EF) ≥10% or a reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume ≥10%. Baseline characteristics including peak oxygen uptake (V̇O) and isometric knee extensor muscle strength (IKEMS) were similar in both groups, but non-responders had lower EF and larger LV. During the ET program, neither group had exercise-related adverse event including life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia. Peak V̇O and IKEMS were significantly improved in both groups and there was no significant difference in change in peak V̇O or IKEMS between responders and non-responders. On multiple regression analysis, change in IKEMS was an independent predictor of change in peak V̇O, whereas the response to CRT was not. In HF patients undergoing CRT implantation, ET safely improved exercise capacity regardless of response to CRT, suggesting that even advanced HF patients without response to CRT can possibly benefit from ET.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7890285PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-18-0015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

response crt
16
peak v̇o
12
exercise training
8
heart failure
8
echocardiographic response
8
cardiac resynchronization
8
resynchronization therapy
8
patients response
8
responders non-responders
8
v̇o ikems
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!