Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
It is a common problem in precise submillimeter-wave telescopes that thermal deformation coupling between major subsystems results from materials with different coefficients of thermal expansion or at different temperatures. Here, the method of combining thermal homology theory with a genetic algorithm (CTHTGA) is proposed for the design and optimization of large precise submillimeter-wave antennas. The CTHTGA method has two key steps: (1) design of the structure of the antenna according to thermal homology theory; and (2) structural optimization based on the genetic algorithm. It has the ability to solve the problem of thermal deformation coupling well and to ensure sufficient rigidity. As an application, CTHTGA was used in the design and optimization of a 1.2 m submillimeter-wave telescope. The results showed that the CTHTGA method, compared to the previous design of a 1.2 m antenna, not only dramatically decreases the impact of thermal deformation coupling but gives the designed antenna sufficient stiffness and smaller gravity deformation. Moreover, other things being equal, a method of combining thermal homology theory with zero-order and a first-order compound optimization algorithm is used to quantitatively validate the CTHTGA method. As the results suggest, the overall performance of the CTHTGA is, to the best of our knowledge, better than that of the latter method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.416316 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!