A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 143

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Breast cancer preoperative FDG-PET, overall survival prognostic separation compared with the lymph node ratio. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative PET scans in breast cancer compared to the lymph node ratio (LNR) for predicting overall survival.
  • Data from 104 patients were analyzed after a median follow-up of 14.7 years, finding that both LNR and PET scans had significant impacts on survival rates, but LNR was identified as the stronger prognostic indicator.
  • While lymph node assessment remains the primary standard for prognosis, PET scans showed promise as a supplementary tool, especially in a model without lymph node data, suggesting further research is needed.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the overall survival prognostic value of preoperative F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer, as compared with the lymph node ratio (LNR).

Methods: Data were abstracted at a median follow-up 14.7 years from a retrospective cohort of 104 patients who underwent PET imaging before curative surgery. PET-Axillary|Sternal was classified as PET-positive if hypermetabolism was visualized in ipsilateral nodal axillary and/or sternal region, else as PET-negative. The differences of 15 years restricted mean survival time ∆ according to PET and LNR were computed from Kaplan-Meier overall survival. The effect of PET and other patients' characteristics was analyzed through rankit normalization, which provides with Cox regression the Royston-Sauerbrei D measure of separation to compare the characteristics (0 indicating no prognostic value). Multivariate analysis of the normalized characteristics used stepwise selection with the Akaike information criterion.

Results: In Kaplan-Meier analysis, LNR > 0.20 versus ≤ 0.20 showed ∆ = 3.4 years, P = 0.003. PET-Axillary|Sternal positivity versus PET-negative showed a ∆ = 2.6 years, P = 0.008. In Cox univariate analyses, LNR appeared as topmost prognostic separator, D = 1.50, P < 0.001. PET ranked below but was also highly significant, D = 1.02, P = 0.009. In multivariate analyses, LNR and PET-Axillary|Sternal were colinear and mutually exclusive. PET-Axillary|Sternal improved as prognosticator in a model excluding lymph nodes, yielding a normalized hazard ratio of 2.44, P = 0.062.

Conclusion: Pathological lymph node assessment remains the gold standard of prognosis. However, PET appears as a valuable surrogate in univariate analysis at 15-year follow-up. There was a trend towards significance in multivariate analysis that warrants further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01234-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
8
survival prognostic
8
compared lymph
8
lymph node
8
node ratio
8
cancer preoperative
4
preoperative fdg-pet
4
survival
4
fdg-pet survival
4
prognostic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!