Background: Several observational studies have shown that the inappropriate dosing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) that does not conform to recommendations is becoming a widespread phenomenon. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to assess the effect of non-recommended doses versus recommended doses of DOACs on the effectiveness and safety outcomes among AF patients.

Methods: The PubMed and Ovid databases were systematically searched to identify the relevant studies until December 2020. The effect estimates were hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), which were pooled using a fixed-effects model (I  ≤ 50%) or a random-effects model (I  > 50%).

Results: A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non-recommended low dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE, HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.49) and all-cause death (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.62), but not the ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and major bleeding. Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non-recommended high dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.01-2.04), major bleeding (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.48-2.68), and all-cause death(HR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.02-1.87).

Conclusion: Compared with recommended dosing of DOACs, non-recommended low dosing of DOACs was associated with increased risks of SSE and all-cause death. Further study should confirm the findings of non-recommended high dosing versus recommended dosing of DOACs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8027572PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.23586DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dosing doacs
28
recommended dosing
16
versus recommended
12
compared recommended
12
doacs non-recommended
12
doacs associated
12
associated increased
12
increased risks
12
dosing
9
doacs
9

Similar Publications

Background: A significant number of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) receives off-label or inappropriate doses. This study examines the prevalence, dosages, and clinical outcomes in AF-patients on DOAC therapy admitted to an emergency department (ED).

Methods: This retrospective single-center observational study utilized data from the Heidelberg Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (HERA-FIB), consecutively including patients with AF presenting to the ED of the University Hospital of Heidelberg from June 2009 to March 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

At standard doses, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with a reduced risk of systemic embolism and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) when compared with warfarin, with a greater derived benefit at lower creatinine clearance (CrCl-down to 25 mL/min). Lower doses of DOACs were associated with increased overall mortality without a significant decrease in ICH and incident bleeding when compared with standard dose DOACs and warfarin, across all CrCl down to 25 mL/min..

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effectiveness and Safety of Dose-Specific DOACs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Cardiovasc Ther

January 2025

College of Pharmacy and Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Dose adjustments of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation are based on pivotal clinical trials assessing their effectiveness and safety in controlled settings. However, the appropriateness of these dosing strategies in real-world practice is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of dose-specific DOACs with those of warfarin.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Off-label under- and overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is not uncommon in real-world practice.

Objective: This study aimed to identify efficacy and safety of off-label DOACs dose after AF ablation.

Methods: The RYOUMA registry was a prospective multicenter study of Japanese patients who underwent AF ablation between 2017 and 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction The appropriate use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is crucial in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to prevent thromboembolic complications. The use of inappropriate doses is common, but information on its prevalence and determining factors in low-income countries is insufficient. Objective The objective of this study is to quantify the prevalence and identify demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors associated with inappropriate dosing of DOACs in patients with NVAF in a low-income country.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!