Objective: To investigate if 3D printed guides and preoperative planning can accurately control femoral stem anteversion.

Methods: A prospective comparative study was carried out from 2018 to 2020, including 53 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. The target rotation center of the femoral head is determined by three-dimensional planning. In group A, planning was made by 2D templates. In group B, preoperative 3D planning and 3D printed osteotomy/positioning guides were performed. After the operation, 3D model registration was performed to calculate the accuracy of anteversion restoration.

Results: We screened 60 patients and randomized a total of 53 to 2 parallel study arms: 30 patients to the group A (traditional operation) and 23 patients to the group B (3D preoperative planning and 3D printed guide). There were no significant differences in demographic or perioperative data between study groups. The restoration accuracy of group A was 5.42° ± 3.65° and of group B was 2.32° ± 1.89°. The number and rate of abnormal cases was 15 (50%) and 2 (8.7%), respectively. Significant statistical differences were found in angle change, restoration accuracy, and number of abnormal cases.

Conclusion: Three-dimensional preoperative planning and 3D printed guides can improve the accuracy of the restoration of femoral anteversion during hip arthroplasty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7910057PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6621882DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preoperative planning
20
printed guides
12
hip arthroplasty
12
planning printed
12
guides preoperative
8
group preoperative
8
patients group
8
restoration accuracy
8
planning
7
group
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!