Human skins are exposed to nanomaterials in everyday life from various sources such as nanomaterial-containing cosmetics, air pollutions, and industrial nanomaterials. Nanomaterials comprising metal haptens raises concerns about the skin sensitization to nanomaterials. In this study, we evaluated the skin sensitization of nanomaterials comparing metal haptens and . We selected five metal oxide NPs, containing copper oxide, cobalt monoxide, cobalt oxide, nickel oxide, or titanium oxide, and two types of metal chlorides (CoCl and CuCl), to compare the skin sensitization abilities between NPs and the constituent metals. The materials were applied to KeratinoSens cells for imitated skin-environment setting, and luciferase induction and cytotoxicity were evaluated at 48 h post-incubation. In addition, the response of metal oxide NPs was confirmed in lymph node of BALB/C mice via an method. The results showed that CuO and CoO NPs induce a similar pattern of positive luciferase induction and cytotoxicity compared to the respective metal chlorides; CoO, NiO, and TiO induced no such response. Collectively, the results implied fast-dissolving metal oxide (CuO and CoO) NPs release their metal ion, inducing skin sensitization. However, further investigations are required to elucidate the mechanism underlying NP-induced skin sensitization. Based on ion chelation data, metal ion release was confirmed as the major "factor" for skin sensitization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7933575PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.627781DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin sensitization
28
metal oxide
16
metal
10
oxide
8
metal haptens
8
sensitization nanomaterials
8
oxide nps
8
metal chlorides
8
luciferase induction
8
induction cytotoxicity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!