AI Article Synopsis

  • Trustworthy guidelines require a basis in systematic reviews of the best available evidence, but often there is limited or no direct evidence available for clinical questions.
  • An expert evidence survey was conducted to gather unpublished observations from panel members when direct literature was absent, focusing on case data and outcomes rather than opinions.
  • In a study of pediatric venous thromboembolism, 12 out of 26 prioritized questions lacked sufficient evidence, highlighting the need for transparency in addressing gaps in published data for clinical practice recommendations.

Article Abstract

Objectives: One essential requirement of trustworthy guidelines is that they should be based on systematic reviews of the best available evidence. The GRADE Working Group has provided guidance for evaluating the certainty of evidence based on several domains. However, for many clinical questions, published evidence may be limited, too indirect or simply not exist. In this brief report (GRADE notes), we describe our method of developing evidence-based recommendations when publisheddirect evidence was lacking.

Study Design And Setting: When direct published literature was absent, an expert evidence survey was administered to panel members about their unpublished observations and case series. Focus was on collecting data about cases and outcome, not panel opinions.

Results: Out of 26 questions prioritized by the panel for pediatric venous thromboembolism, 12 had no, very limited, or very low certainty of evidence to inform them. The panel survey was administered for these questions.

Conclusions: Areas of sparse evidence often reflect key questions that are critical to address in clinical practice guidelines due to the uncertainty among health care providers. The expert evidence approach used in this study is one method for panels totransparently deal with the lack of published evidence to directly inform recommendations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

expert evidence
12
evidence
10
grade notes
8
evidence approach
8
certainty evidence
8
published evidence
8
survey administered
8
grade
4
notes grade
4
grade "no"
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: Continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring is increasingly used in the management of neonates with seizures. There remains debate on what clinically relevant information can be gained from cEEG in neonates with suspected seizures, at high risk for seizures, or with definite seizures, as well as the use of cEEG for prognosis in a variety of conditions. In this guideline, we address these questions using American Clinical Neurophysiology Society structured methodology for clinical guideline development.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prognostic Implications of Cardiac Geometry in Cirrhosis: Findings From a Large Cohort.

Liver Int

February 2025

General Practice Ward/International Medical Center Ward, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Background And Aims: Cirrhosis is characterised by hyperdynamic circulation, which contributes to cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM). However, the expert consensus on CCM did not initially include cardiac structure because of scant evidence. Therefore, this study investigated the associations of cardiac chamber geometry with mortality and CCM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: POCUS is a core emergency medicine skill and mainstay of early pregnancy assessment. The ultrasound competency assessment tool was developed as an entrustment-based assessment tool for use by content experts evaluating trainees performing multiple POCUS study types. The objective of this study was to evaluate the scoring and extrapolation inferences of the tool within Kane's validity framework when used to assess trainees performing an early pregnancy POCUS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Treatment of Seizures in People with Intellectual Disability.

CNS Drugs

January 2025

Cornwall Intellectual Disability Equitable Research (CIDER), University of Plymouth, Truro, England.

There is a synergistic relationship between epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID), and the approach to managing people with these conditions needs to be holistic. Epilepsy is the main co-morbidity associated with ID, and clinical presentation tends to be complex, associated with higher rates of treatment resistance, multi-morbidity and premature mortality. Despite this relationship, there is limited level 1 evidence to inform treatment choice for this vulnerable population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cancer is a major health challenge globally and in Sri Lanka. Providing comprehensive information to patients is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction, supported by evidence of its effectiveness in managing cancer pain. EORTC QLQ-INFO25, an information module developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group, is aimed at assessing cancer patients' perception of information received during different phases of care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!