AI Article Synopsis

  • This study analyzed the effectiveness of procalcitonin (PCT) levels in differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial infections in patients with severe exacerbations of COPD admitted to the ICU.
  • Results showed that PCT levels were significantly higher in patients with bacterial infections compared to those without documented pathogens, but the overall accuracy of PCT for predicting bacterial infections was low (c-index around 0.64).
  • The conclusion indicates that, although higher PCT levels were observed in bacterial cases, the test's ability to accurately distinguish between infection types is limited.

Article Abstract

Background: To assess the ability of procalcitonin (PCT) to distinguish between bacterial and nonbacterial causes of patients with severe acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) admitted to the ICU, we conducted a retrospective analysis of two prospective studies including 375 patients with severe AECOPD with suspected lower respiratory tract infections. PCT levels were sequentially assessed at the time of inclusion, 6 h after and at day 1, using a sensitive immunoassay. The patients were classified according to the presence of a documented bacterial infection (including bacterial and viral coinfection) (BAC + group), or the absence of a documented bacterial infection (i.e., a documented viral infection alone or absence of a documented pathogen) (BAC- group). The accuracy of PCT levels in predicting bacterial infection (BAC + group) vs no bacterial infection (BAC- group) at different time points was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: Regarding the entire cohort (n = 375), at any time, the PCT levels significantly differed between groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). A pairwise comparison showed that PCT levels were significantly higher in patients with bacterial infection (n = 94) than in patients without documented pathogens (n = 218) (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between patients with bacterial and viral infection (n = 63). For example, the median PCT-H levels were 0.64 ng/ml [0.22-0.87] in the bacterial group vs 0.24 ng/ml [0.15-0.37] in the viral group and 0.16 ng/mL [0.11-0.22] in the group without documented pathogens. With a c-index of 0.64 (95% CI; 0.58-0.71) at H, 0.64 [95% CI 0.57-0.70] at H and 0.63 (95% CI; 0.56-0.69) at H, PCT had a low accuracy for predicting bacterial infection (BAC + group).

Conclusion: Despite higher PCT levels in severe AECOPD caused by bacterial infection, PCT had a poor accuracy to distinguish between bacterial and nonbacterial infection. Procalcitonin might not be sufficient as a standalone marker for initiating antibiotic treatment in this setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936235PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00816-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bacterial infection
16
pct levels
12
ability procalcitonin
8
distinguish bacterial
8
bacterial nonbacterial
8
severe acute
8
acute exacerbation
8
patients severe
8
documented bacterial
8
absence documented
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!