Introduction: Transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) are anchored prosthetic systems for major limb loss. Sometimes TOPS patients suffer from periprosthetic fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the management and outcomes of periprosthetic fractures in patients with TOPS and to introduce a novel classification system for this entity.
Material/methods: Since 2010, 140 patients were treated with TOPS after transfemoral amputation in two centers in Germany. Fifteen patients sustained periprosthetic fractures, with five intra- and ten postoperative fractures. The outcome was analyzed by Prosthesis Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ), K-level and prosthesis wear time per day. A subgroup analysis for the body mass index (BMI) was performed.
Results: All postoperative fractures were treated with implant-retaining osteosynthesis. Fourteen fractures healed without complications after a mean of 3 months. One postoperative fracture developed a clinically asymptomatic firm non-union. No Endo-Fixstem had to be removed. For the fracture and control group, a significant increase of the PMQ (p < 0.001) and K-level (p < 0.001) was observed after TOPS treatment compared to the preoperative baseline. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed a significant increase of the PMQ and K-level for both normal weight (p = 0.002) and overweight patients (p < 0.001). Of interest, overweight patients even showed a significantly higher increase in scores compared to normal weight patients, regardless of periprosthetic fracture.
Conclusion: Periprosthetic fractures do not necessarily worsen outcomes of TOPS treatment. Proper classification and standardized appropriate treatment strategies according to fracture morphology are paramount for reliably good outcomes. We recommend to not remove or exchange the implant (Endo-Fixstem) even if it is assembly. Higher BMI did not have an impact onto rehabilitation success after TOPS to major limb loss of the lower extremity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9217873 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03826-y | DOI Listing |
Aims: The Peri-Implant and PeriProsthetic Survival AnalysiS (PIPPAS) study aimed to investigate the risk factors for one-year mortality of femoral peri-implant fractures (FPIFs).
Methods: This prospective, multicentre, observational study involved 440 FPIF patients with a minimum one-year follow-up. Data on demographics, clinical features, fracture characteristics, management, and mortality rates were collected and analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analyses.
J Arthroplasty
February 2025
American Joint Replacement Registry, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rosemont, Illinois.
J Orthop Trauma
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Objective: To evaluate mechanical failure rates of retrograde femoral nails in the treatment of distal femur fractures.
Methods: Design: Retrospective chart review.
Setting: Urban Academic Level 1 Trauma Center.
J Orthop Trauma
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, NY, USA.
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of perioperative variables including PT and walking distance on length of stay (LOS) in hip fracture patients.
Methods: Design: A retrospective review.
Setting: Single level I trauma center.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!