AI Article Synopsis

  • PCR using DNA from dried blood spots (DBS) is a rapid and cost-effective method for large-scale studies, but this research compares its effectiveness to DNA from whole blood in detecting malaria parasites.
  • While the overall performance of PCR for malaria detection shows no significant difference between DBS and whole blood,
  • a subgroup analysis indicates that DBS is less accurate for detecting the malaria strain Plasmodium vivax, suggesting potential for missed diagnoses.
  • The study calls for further research to improve the accuracy of PCR using DBS for detecting malaria, especially as efforts to eradicate the disease intensify.

Article Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from dried blood spots (DBS) provides a fast, inexpensive, and convenient method for large-scale epidemiological studies. This study compared the performance of PCR between DNA extracted from DBS and DNA obtained from whole blood for detecting malarial parasites. Primary studies assessing the diagnostic performance of PCR using DNA extracted from DBS and whole blood for detecting malarial parasites were obtained from the ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted in forest plots using Review Manager version 5.3. Statistical analysis was performed via random-effects meta-analysis. Data heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic. Of the 904 studies retrieved from the databases, seven were included in this study. The pooled meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the comparative performance of PCR for detecting malaria parasites between DNA extracted from DBS and that extracted from whole blood (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.62-1.16; I = 78%). However, subgroup analysis demonstrated that PCR using DNA extracted from DBS was less accurate in detecting Plasmodium vivax than that using DNA extracted from whole blood (OR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.77-0.94). In conclusion, a significant difference in detecting P. vivax was observed between PCR using DNA extracted from DBS and that using DNA extracted from whole blood. Therefore, P. vivax in endemic areas should be identified and detected with care with PCR using DNA obtained from DBS which potentially leads to a negative result. Further studies are required to investigate the performance of PCR using DBS for detecting P. vivax and other malarial parasites to provide data in research and routine surveillance of malaria, especially with renewed efforts towards the eradication of the disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7921648PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83977-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dna extracted
36
pcr dna
24
performance pcr
20
extracted dbs
20
malarial parasites
12
extracted blood
12
dna
11
extracted
10
pcr
9
comparative performance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!