Purpose: The distinction between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases has a significant impact on tumor staging and therapeutic choices. Several criteria have been proposed to solve this diagnostic issue, but a definitive consensus is still missing. We tested the efficacy of a combined clinical, histopathological and molecular ("real world") approach for the correct classification of multiple lung tumors in a selected cohort of patients.

Methods: 24 multiple lung tumors with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma from 10 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological, pathological and clinical information, including follow-up, were integrated with molecular profiling via a routine multigene panel sequencing.

Results: Comprehensive histologic assessment revealed readily distinguishable histologic patterns between multiple tumors suggesting unrelated lesions in 7 cases, in agreement with clinical, radiological and molecular data, thus leading to final diagnosis of MPLCs. In the remaining 3 cases, the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and intrapulmonary metastases was challenging, since the histologic features of the lesions were similar or identical. The final interpretation (2 MPLCs and 1 most likely intrapulmonary metastases) was reached thanks to the integration of all available data, and was confirmed by follow-up.

Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach including a routinely affordable multigene panel sequencing is a useful tool to discriminate MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastases in multiple lung nodules sharing the adenocarcinoma histotype.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2021.153387DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intrapulmonary metastases
20
mplcs intrapulmonary
16
multiple lung
12
multidisciplinary approach
8
differential diagnosis
8
multiple primary
8
primary lung
8
lung tumors
8
multigene panel
8
diagnosis mplcs
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a quality improvement initiative on intraoperative lymph node (LN) dissection adequacy.

Methods: A single-centre cohort of 781 naïve patients who underwent resection of non-small cell lung cancer with pathological LN involvement and survived beyond 90 days was reviewed. LN dissection metrics were compared before and after the implementation of a quality improvement initiative.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: With the implementation of low-dose computed tomography screening, multiple pulmonary tumor nodules are diagnosed with increasing frequency and the selection of surgical treatments versus systemic therapies has become challenging on a daily basis in clinical practice. In the presence of multiple carcinomas, especially adenocarcinomas, pathologically determined to be of pulmonary origin, the distinction between separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is important for staging, management, and prognostication.

Methods: We systemically reviewed various means that aid in the differentiation between SPLCs and IPMs explored by histopathologic evaluation and molecular profiling, the latter includes DNA microsatellite analysis, array comparative genomic hybridization, TP53 and oncogenic driver mutation testing and, more recently, with promising effectiveness, next-generation sequencing comprising small- or large-scale multi-gene panels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The appropriate extent of hilar lymph node (LN) dissection in segmentectomy for lung cancer has not yet been fully investigated. Herein, we assessed the patterns of LN metastasis using network analyses.

Methods: Patients with nodal metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer measuring ≤30 mm in diameter who underwent anatomical resection were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diagnosis and management of multiple primary lung cancer.

Front Oncol

October 2024

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China.

Article Synopsis
  • - Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) is becoming more common and is classified into synchronous (sMPLC) and metachronous (mMPLC) types, which require careful differentiation from intrapulmonary metastases (IPM) for proper treatment.
  • - Diagnosis of MPLC relies on histology, imaging, and molecular methods, with imaging being crucial for preoperative assessments and histology providing definitive diagnoses.
  • - Surgical intervention is the primary treatment option, supplemented by techniques like stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation for lesions that can't be surgically removed; targeted therapies and immunotherapies may also be used, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment planning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!