A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Biologic Agents Preserve the C-2 Pedicle in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparative Imaging Study Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to determine if biologic agents (BAs) help maintain the size of a critical C-2 pedicle screw trajectory in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  • It analyzed CT images from 100 RA patients, comparing those treated with BAs to those who were not, and found that BAs allowed for a larger screw diameter and less joint damage.
  • The findings suggest that early treatment with BAs is crucial to preserve the C-2 pedicle's size, which is vital for effective surgical stabilization of the cervical spine in RA patients.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether biologic agents (BAs) reduce a narrow C-2 pedicle screw trajectory, which is often a key stabilizer in surgical treatment, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: A total of 100 patients with RA treated with and without BAs (BA [+] group [n = 50] and BA [-] group [n = 50]), respectively, were included in the present study. Computed tomography (CT) images of their cervical spine, including C-2, were analyzed. The maximum screw diameter at C-2 that could be inserted without breaching the cortex, measured on 3-dimensional images using a CT-based navigation system, was compared between the groups with and without BA administration. Furthermore, the destruction of the atlantoaxial joint was examined using CT images. The risk factors for a narrow C-2 pedicle were elucidated among the patients treated with BAs.

Results: The pedicle in the BA (+) group had a significantly larger C-2 maximum screw diameter than the BA (-) group (6.00 mm vs. 5.13 mm, P < 0.001), with less destruction of the atlantoaxial joint. Among the BA (+) group, a longer period until the initial administration of BAs and RA disease duration were associated with a narrow C-2 pedicle.

Conclusions: This study suggests that BAs can maintain the trajectory for C-2 pedicle screws, which acts as a key stabilizer in surgical management for the rheumatoid cervical spine, by halting the destruction of the atlantoaxial joint. Early introduction of BAs can be especially important to prevent the narrowing of the C-2 pedicle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.096DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

c-2 pedicle
20
narrow c-2
12
destruction atlantoaxial
12
atlantoaxial joint
12
c-2
9
biologic agents
8
patients rheumatoid
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8
computed tomography
8
key stabilizer
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!