The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is the most popular adult measure of individual differences in theory of mind. We present a meta-analytic investigation of the test's psychometric properties ( = 119 effect sizes, 61 studies, = 8,611 persons). Using random effects models, we found the internal consistency of the test was acceptable (α = .73). However, the RMET was more strongly related with emotion perception ( = .33, ρ = .48) relative to alternative theory of mind measures ( = .29, ρ = .39), and weakly to moderately related with vocabulary ( = .25, ρ = .32), cognitive empathy ( = .14, ρ = .20), and affective empathy ( = .13, ρ = .19). Overall, we conclude that the RMET operates rather as emotion perception measure than as theory of mind measure, challenging the interpretation of RMET results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191121996469DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

theory mind
12
meta-analytic investigation
8
internal consistency
8
emotion perception
8
mind
5
sty mind's
4
mind's eye
4
eye meta-analytic
4
investigation nomological
4
nomological network
4

Similar Publications

Background: Self-control is essential for individual health and well-being. The relationship between mindfulness and self-control has recently become a central focus of research. However, the dynamics of this relationship in deaf and hearing individuals remain underexplored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

After years of armed conflict in northern Uganda, many local people have turned to Evangelical churches for help with healing and recovery. We observe that the healing practices in these churches encourage particular notions of what the mind is, how the mind works and whether it is bounded or porous to the outside world. In the traditional cultural setting in which these people grew to adulthood, many accept that vengeance can attack supernaturally from without.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Kindness Is the Language That the Deaf Can Hear and the Blind Can See: Kindness, Theory of Mind and Well-Being in Adolescents.

Children (Basel)

December 2024

Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Education Building, 3700 Mc Tavish St., Montreal, QC H3A 1Y2, Canada.

Background/objectives: This mixed-methods, cross-sectional study explored adolescent understandings of kindness, and interconnections amongst Theory of Mind (ToM; ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others), kindness, compassion, and social-psychological well-being components in 318 participants aged 10-18 (Mage = 14.58, = 2.31).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

If "theory of mind" is conceived as reasoning in a strict sense, then it can be said to be useful only at certain times; however, this leaves the rest of social cognition hardly comprehensible. If "theory of mind" is used instead to refer to a mentalist ontology and the consequent awareness that we ourselves and the others function on mental states, then we need new approaches that explain the flow of social experience. To illustrate these points, we outline the general conceptual framework that underlies most empirical studies of theory of mind and discuss their pros and cons; then, we discuss the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale, a tool developed to investigate the complexity of theory of mind, which adopts a different perspective and has been successfully tested on numerous populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!