The impact of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners on the central nervous system: preliminary study.

Nutr Neurosci

Laboratorio de Neuroquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México.

Published: August 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • More people are eating foods and drinks with sweeteners added, like sugar and artificial sweeteners.
  • A study tested how eating these sweeteners affects brain function by testing 39 young adults before and after they consumed different types of sweeteners for six weeks.
  • The results showed that while some sweeteners didn't change brain function, those who consumed sucralose had worse memory and thinking skills by the end of the study.

Article Abstract

Background: Human consumption of food and beverages containing added nutritive or non-nutritive sweeteners has increased worldwide.

Objective: The present study evaluated the possible impact of frequent sweetener consumption on human CNS activity and functions through neuropsychological testing and EEG/qEEG analysis.

Methods: A sample of 23 women and 16 men, aged 18-35, with a body mass index between 18 and 24.9 kg/m was evaluated. Participants underwent a 1-week washout period in which food with added sugars or sweeteners was restricted from their diet. Initial assessment of cognitive functions was performed with a validated neuropsychological test and EEG/qEEG analysis, prior to supplementation. Sucrose, sucralose, or steviol glycosides, in commercially available presentations, were randomly assigned to three experimental groups of 13 participants each. Sweeteners were supplemented in fixed amounts, daily, for six weeks. After supplementation, neurological tests were repeated and the initial and final results were compared.

Results: The results show no significant changes between final and initial measures in the steviol glycosides group. However, a significant decrease in encoding memory was found in the sucrose group in the final evaluation. Strikingly, the sucralose group showed a significant decrease in overall memory, encoding memory, and executive functions after supplementation. Furthermore, qEEG analysis showed an increase in theta wave absolute and relative power at the final evaluation in the same group.

Conclusion: These data show that frequent consumption of specific sweeteners is accompanied by measurable changes in EEG/qEEG activity and neuropsychological test performance in humans.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2021.1885239DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nutritive non-nutritive
8
non-nutritive sweeteners
8
neuropsychological test
8
steviol glycosides
8
group decrease
8
encoding memory
8
final evaluation
8
sweeteners
5
impact nutritive
4
sweeteners central
4

Similar Publications

Ndufs4 inactivation in glutamatergic neurons reveals swallow-breathing discoordination in a mouse model of Leigh syndrome.

Exp Neurol

December 2024

Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, United States of America; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98108, USA. Electronic address:

Swallowing, both nutritive and non-nutritive, is highly dysfunctional in children with Leigh Syndrome (LS) and contributes to the need for both gastrostomy and tracheostomy tube placement. Without these interventions aspiration of food, liquid, and mucus occur resulting in repeated bouts of respiratory infection. No study has investigated whether mouse models of LS, a neurometabolic disorder, exhibit dysfunctions in neuromuscular activity of swallow and breathing integration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Health: Reconciling Evidence and Interrogating Guideline Disconnects.

Adv Nutr

December 2024

Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The effect of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) on long-term satiety is not well understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the effect of NNSs on long-term total energy and macronutrients intake.

Methods: Online databases including Scopus, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched up to September 2024 to find relevant randomized control trials (RCTs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to explore the relationship between non-nutritive sweetener (NNS) consumption and diet quality, using data from the American Cancer Society's cancer prevention study with over 163,000 participants.
  • - Results showed that consumers of NNS generally had lower diet quality compared to non-consumers, as indicated by decreases in both the ACS diet score and the Healthy Eating Index scores with increased NNS intake.
  • - Additionally, the likelihood of having a low diet quality increased with higher NNS consumption, indicating that those who consumed 2 or more servings of NNS daily had significantly higher odds of poor diet quality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigates the usage of low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) among women of reproductive age (WRA) in Australia, highlighting concerns over potential health implications.*
  • Through a two-stage analysis, researchers identified different consumption patterns of LCS and assessed how various sociodemographic and lifestyle factors influenced these patterns.*
  • Results showed that 44.7% of surveyed women consume LCS, with distinct patterns identified: light, moderate, and heavy users. Factors influencing usage included cultural background, participation in weight loss programs, and socioeconomic status, indicating a need for targeted health interventions.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!