Background: The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) has been studied to predict right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but only as a single time point before LVAD implantation. Multiple clinical factors and therapies impact RV function in pre-LVAD patients. Thus, we hypothesized that serial PAPi measurements during cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) optimization before LVAD implantation would provide incremental risk stratification for early RVF after LVAD implantation.

Methods And Results: Consecutive patients who underwent sequential pulmonary artery catherization with cardiac intensive care optimization before durable LVAD implantation were included. Serial hemodynamics were reviewed retrospectively across the optimization period. The optimal PAPi was defined by the initial PAPi + the PAPi at optimized hemodynamics. RVF was defined as need for a right ventricular assist device or prolonged inotrope use (>14 days postoperatively). Patients with early RVF had significantly lower mean optimal PAPi (3.5 vs 7.5, P < .001) compared with those who did not develop RVF. After adjusting for established risk factors of early RVF after LVAD implantation, the optimal PAPi was independently and incrementally associated with early RVF after LVAD implantation (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.532-0.765, P < .0001).

Conclusions: Optimal PAPi achieved during medical optimization before LVAD implantation provides independent and incremental risk stratification for early RVF, likely identifying dynamic RV reserve.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257976PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.02.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lvad implantation
28
early rvf
20
optimal papi
16
pulmonary artery
12
incremental risk
12
ventricular assist
12
assist device
12
rvf lvad
12
artery pulsatility
8
ventricular failure
8

Similar Publications

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical condition with symptoms that result from ineffective ejection of blood due to functional or structural impairment of the heart. The most common causes of HF include ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction (MI), hypertension, and valvular heart disease (VHD). As HF progresses to advanced stages, interventions, like left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), become essential, especially for patients ineligible for heart transplantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Delivering care that is responsive to who or what is most important to patients and family caregivers is a key aspect of quality care, yet it remains unclear how clinicians can best support individuals in expressing their personal values. We aimed to describe patient- and family caregiver-identified facilitators and barriers to engaging in values discussions with clinicians following implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Methods and results Using a qualitative descriptive approach, patients with an LVAD and their caregivers participated in one-on-one semi structured interviews and self-reported sociodemographics (January 2023-July 2023).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Although left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an alternative to heart transplantation, their artificial surfaces often lead to serious thrombotic complications requiring high-risk device replacement. Coating blood-contacting surfaces with antithrombogenic endothelial cells is considered an effective strategy for preventing thrombus formation. However, this concept has not yet been successfully implemented in LVADs, as severe cell loss is to be expected, especially on the impeller surface with high prothrombogenic supraphysiological shear stress.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Congestive heart failure has reached pandemic levels, and left-ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are increasingly used to treat refractory heart failure. Infection is a leading complication of LVADs. Despite numerous reports (most being retrospective), several knowledge gaps pertaining to the epidemiology and burden of an LVAD-associated infection (LVADi) remain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical outcomes of modified left ventricular assist device driveline management.

J Artif Organs

December 2024

Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita Shi, Osaka, Osaka fu, 565-0871, Japan.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are implanted in patients with heart failure to support cardiac circulation. However, no standardized methods have been established for LVAD driveline exit site management for the prevention of infections. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy of modified driveline management compared with that of conventional driveline management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!