Introduction: One of the most often stated tenets of haemophilia care is that prophylaxis converts a person from a severe to a moderate phenotype. In this review, we argue that this is not an accurate assumption and that people on prophylaxis predominantly have factor VIII/IX levels in the mild range.
Moderate Haemophilia And Prophylaxis: People with moderate haemophilia, who are treating with on-demand regimens, experience joint bleeds and often develop significant arthropathy. This is especially true for people with a baseline level of 1-3 IU/dl, as first reported 55 years ago, and confirmed in more recent studies. Evidence is emerging suggesting that people with severe haemophilia who are using prophylaxis have better musculoskeletal outcomes than people with moderate haemophilia treated episodically.
Trough Levels: The debate around the optimum trough level whilst on prophylaxis is ongoing. It is not appropriate to extrapolate information about baseline levels to recommendations about target trough levels on prophylaxis because these are different situations. Studies are emerging that support higher target trough levels than previously used, but in spite of this, the aim of achieving zero bleeds remains elusive with both factor replacement and non-replacement therapies.
Conclusions: We recommend that people with moderate haemophilia, especially those with a baseline of 1-3 IU/dl, should be offered prophylaxis based on the same criteria as people with severe haemophilia. Trough levels should be maintained above 3 IU/dl or higher if a level of 3 IU/dl does not control breakthrough bleeding and prophylaxis should be tailored to the bleeding phenotype. This advice is in line with recently published guidelines from the World Federation of Haemophilia and the UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hae.14201 | DOI Listing |
Haemophilia
January 2025
Haemophilia Centre/Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Introduction: Infants with haemophilia, due to parental overprotection, have difficulty developing their full motor repertoire of typical gross motor development. It is of great clinical importance to evaluate the motor development of these infants with a standardized assessment tool.
Aim: To study the gross motor development in infants with haemophilia, using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and compare it with full-term (FT) and preterm infants (PT).
Thromb Haemost
January 2025
Department of Pediatrics, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Background: We previously identified a factor (F)VIII molecular defect associated with an R2159C mutation in the C1 domain (named "FVIII-Ise") together with undetectable FVIII antigen (FVIII:Ag) levels measured by two-site sandwich ELISA using an anti-C2 domain alloantibody (alloAb). The patient had clinically mild hemophilia A, and his reduced FVIII:C correlated with FVIII:Ag measured by ELISA using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with A2 and A2/B domain epitopes, suggesting that the R2159C mutation modified C2 domain antigenicity.
Aim: To investigate functional and structural characteristics of the FVIII-R2159C mutant.
Front Genet
January 2025
Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Objectives: Hemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive inherited bleeding disorder that typically affects men. Women are usually asymptomatic carriers, and rarely presenting with severe or moderately severe phenotype. This study aims to describe a case of a 17-year-old girl with moderate HA, investigating the mechanisms of her condition and the genetic basis within her family.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRes Pract Thromb Haemost
January 2025
Department of Pediatrics and Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Congenital hemophilia A (HA) disease severity has traditionally been categorized according to intrinsic factor (F)VIII levels, with <1% of normal indicating severe HA, 1% to 5% moderate HA, and 6% to 40% mild HA. However, mounting evidence illustrates considerable variability in bleeding phenotype regardless of FVIII level. Despite treatment advances, people with moderate or mild HA may be neglected, as treatment guidelines and established norms focus on FVIII levels, and many clinical trials do not include people with FVIII > 1%.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTurk J Pediatr
December 2024
Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Background: Patients with hemophilia should be evaluated for joint health and overall health in their visits. The aims of this study were to evaluate joint health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with mild, moderate, and severe hemophilia; determine which patient groups to focus on and whether there are any neglected patient groups.
Methods: This was a single-center, cross-sectional study.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!