AI Article Synopsis

  • Biofeedback is the leading therapy for treating anismus, while osteopathy is explored as an alternative for constipation in this study that compares their effectiveness for dyssynergic defecation.
  • A pilot study involving 30 patients at an Italian hospital evaluated both treatments using various medical assessments before and after interventions, also checking in again five years later through interviews.
  • Both treatments were similarly effective short-term, but biofeedback showed a notable reduction in obstructed defecation syndrome scores, while osteopathy showed lower scores at three months post-treatment, nearing statistical significance.

Article Abstract

Background: Biofeedback is the most widespread rehabilitative therapy for the treatment of anismus after failed conservative treatment. Osteopathy represents an alternative therapy for constipation. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of osteopathic treatment as compared to biofeedback in patients with dyssynergic defecation.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort pilot study on 30 patients with dyssynergic defecation enrolled at the Colorectal Clinic of the University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy, from May 2015 to May 2016 and followed until May 2020. Dyssynergic defecation was defined as the inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor or less than 20% relaxation of basal resting sphincter pressure (on anal manometry) with adequate propulsive forces during attempted defecation. Dyssynergic patients were divide into 2 treatment groups: 15 patients had osteopathy and 15 patients had biofeedback. Before and 3 months after rehabilitation treatment, all patients had anorectal manometry, defecography, and ultrasound, and were evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) constipation score, obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score, Colo-rectal-anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8), Colo-rectal-anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7), and the Brusciano Score (BS). To evaluate the efficacy of osteopathy and biofeedback in the long-term, all patients completed the above-mentioned questionnaires 5 years later via a telephone interview.

Results: The two treatments were similarly effective in the short term with reduction in questionnaires scores, and increase in the percentage of anal sphincter release at straining at anorectal manometry in both groups. The ODS score was significantly reduced in biofeedback group (p = 0.021). The 3-month post-treatment BS was lower in the osteopathy group, but this just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.050). Periodic rehabilitation reinforcements were provided. The CCF constipation score decreased significantly in the osteopathy group (p = 0.023) after 5 years.

Conclusions: Osteopathy is a promising treatment for dyssynergic defecation, and it can be associated with biofeedback.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02381-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dyssynergic defecation
12
obstructed defecation
8
defecation syndrome
8
osteopathic treatment
8
pilot study
8
patients dyssynergic
8
anorectal manometry
8
ccf constipation
8
constipation score
8
ods score
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!