Quality and Findings of Bitewing Radiographs among Twenty-Year-Old Conscripts in Finland.

Int J Dent

Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Pediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Oral Health Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Published: February 2021

Objectives: Bitewing radiographs are mainly used to confirm clinical findings in caries diagnostics. The objective here was to investigate the quality of bitewing radiographs after short brush-up training and additional findings besides caries in a low-caries population.

Methods: The material of this cross-sectional study comprised 377 pairs of bitewing radiographs of 19- to 20-year-olds taken by dentists. Radiography was considered indicated if one dentinal caries lesion was present on clinical examination. A senior oral radiologist evaluated quality and diagnosed the findings afterwards unaware of clinical status. The association between variables was analysed using cross tabulation and chi-squared testing.

Results: Almost half of the images were of compromised quality (44.1%). Dentinal caries lesions were detected in 82.3% and enamel lesions in 73.5% of the subjects. On average, the subjects had 1.7 (SD 0.52) dentinal lesions. Fillings were found in 81.8%, fractures/cracks in 11.7%, and attrition in 7.4% of the subjects. Signs of excessive bite force were recorded in 19.4%, whereas marginal bone loss was detected in 6.4%. No significant correlation was detected between fractures, attrition, and excessive bite forces.

Conclusions: Effort must be taken to ensure high quality of bitewing radiographs. In addition to caries detection, bitewing radiographs offer additional value, such as detecting excessive bite forces, tooth wear, and marginal bone loss among young adults.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7884133PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8894917DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bitewing radiographs
24
excessive bite
12
findings caries
8
quality bitewing
8
dentinal caries
8
marginal bone
8
bone loss
8
bitewing
6
radiographs
6
quality
5

Similar Publications

Comparing Images from Near-Infrared Light Reflection and Bitewing Radiography to Detect Proximal Caries in Primary Teeth.

Children (Basel)

November 2024

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center, P.O. Box 12272, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.

Objectives: The present prospective study aimed to compare near-infrared light reflection (NIRI) and bitewing radiographs (BWR) images to detect proximal caries in primary teeth.

Methods: 71 children underwent routine BWR, and scans were performed using an intra-oral scanner (iTero Element 5D, Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA), including a near-infrared light source (850 nm) and sensor. Five specialist pediatric dentists examined the NIRI and BWR images.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The combination of different methods has been advocated to increase sensitivity in detecting secondary caries lesions. This cross-sectional study compared the detection of caries lesions around posterior restorations and treatment decisions using bitewing radiographs alone or in combination with clinical information from patient records. The radiographs (n = 212) were randomly distributed into two sequences for assessment across two phases, with a wash-out period of two weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Odontomas are the most prevalent odontogenic tumors, often classified as hamartomas due to their slow growth and non-aggressive nature. Typically asymptomatic, they can obstruct the eruption of adjacent teeth. While the exact causes of odontomas remain unclear, potential factors include local trauma, infection, growth pressure, and hereditary influences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to evaluate how different monitor types and lighting conditions affect the accuracy and duration of diagnosing approximal caries from bitewing radiographs.
  • - Results showed no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy or duration, but factors like ambient light, clinical experience, and the severity of caries did impact the level of confidence in diagnoses.
  • - Overall, the findings suggest that while monitor type and lighting don't affect accuracy, they, along with other factors, influence how confident practitioners feel about their diagnoses of caries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging field in dentistry. AI is gradually being integrated into dentistry to improve clinical dental practice. The aims of this scoping review were to investigate the application of AI in image analysis for decision-making in clinical dentistry and identify trends and research gaps in the current literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!