AI Article Synopsis

  • Immunization is the best preventive method for varicella, with Korea using the MAV/06 strain for vaccination.
  • A new vaccine, MG1111, developed using the Medical Research Council-5 cell line, was approved and its immunogenicity and safety were tested in a study with 515 children in Korea and Thailand.
  • Results showed MG1111 had a high seroconversion rate of 97.9% and comparable safety profiles to the control vaccine, Varivax, indicating it is not immunologically inferior.

Article Abstract

Immunization is the most effective preventive strategy against varicella. While the Oka strain is commonly used for varicella vaccination worldwide, Korea widely uses the MAV/06 strain. A new live attenuated MAV/06 strain varicella vaccine (MG1111), which uses the new cell line Medical Research Council-5 for better viral propagation, was developed. MG1111 was approved by Korean health authorities. Here, we report the results of phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study conducted in Korea and Thailand, which compared the immunogenicity and safety profiles of MG1111 versus the control vaccine, Varivax. In total, 515 healthy children (12 month-12 years) were randomized 1:1 to receive either the MG1111 or control vaccine (MG1111: 258, Control: 257). The seroconversion rate (SCR) and geometric mean titer (GMT) were measured using the fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen (FAMA) test. The MG1111 group achieved a SCR of 97.9% (95% CI: 95.2-99.3) after vaccination. The lower limit of 95% CI for SCR difference (MG1111-Varivax) was -4.0%, which was higher than the specified non-inferiority margin of -10%. Further, the GMT of the MG1111 increased from 2.0 to 74.2 (95% CI: 65.0-84.8) and the lower limits of the 95% CI for post-vaccination GMT ratios (MG1111/Varivax) were 0.55 higher than the specified parameter of 0.5. Therefore, the MG1111 group was not statistically inferior to the control vaccine group in terms of SCR and GMT. Furthermore, the MG1111 and control vaccine groups were not significantly different in the percentage of participants showing adverse events-solicited, local, or systemic during 43-day period of observation and serious adverse events during 6 month of observation. The present results indicate that MG1111was not immunologically inferior to Varivax, and safety profiles of MG1111 are similar to those of Varivax.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control vaccine
16
safety profiles
12
mav/06 strain
12
mg1111
10
immunogenicity safety
8
strain varicella
8
varicella vaccine
8
healthy children
8
phase iii
8
vaccine mg1111
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!