A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fracture Resistance of Reattached Hydrated Fragment of Fractured Incisors. | LitMetric

Fracture Resistance of Reattached Hydrated Fragment of Fractured Incisors.

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Coorg Institute of Dental Sciences, KK Campus, Karnataka, India.

Published: January 2020

Background And Objectives: Fragment reattachment procedure provides conservative treatment option when an intact fractured fragment is available. Rewetting of fractured fragment before reattaching has shown better bond strength of attached fragment. Therefore, fracture resistance of reattached fractured fragment with hydration and without hydration was evaluated and compared.

Materials And Methods: Ellis class II fracture was induced in selected and coded 60 extracted maxillary central incisors using a custom-made-wise and assigned into group I and group II (without hydration and with hydration) and both the groups were further divided into two groups (1 week and 3 months). In group I, fractured fragments were reattached after bench-drying for 24 hours. In group II, fractured fragments were reattached after hydrating for 1 hour following bench-drying for 24 hours. Composite (Filtek Z350 XT, Universal Restorative, 3M ESPE) was used to reattach the fractured fragments. Reattached fractured fragments were stored in artificial saliva for 1 week and 3 months and subjected to fracture resistance test using Universal Testing Machine. The data obtained were tabulated and statistically analyzed.

Results: Fracture resistance in hydration samples was higher than without hydration at the end of 1 week and 3 months statistically. Fracture resistance of fractured fragment at the end of 3 months was higher in both with hydration and without hydration but was not significant with hydration.

Conclusion: Hydration of fractured fragment before reattachment procedure has shown better fracture resistance and improved further after storing in artificial saliva for 3 months.

How To Cite This Article: Suresh M, Mallikarjun SB, Babu G, Fracture Resistance of Reattached Hydrated Fragment of Fractured Incisors. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(5):476-480.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7887173PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1819DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fracture resistance
28
fractured fragment
20
fractured fragments
16
resistance reattached
12
hydration hydration
12
week months
12
fragments reattached
12
fractured
11
fragment
9
hydration
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!