Objective: The aims of this study were to determine the percentage of patients who opt to undergo pessary self-care versus those who return to the office for care and to identify any differences in the characteristics between the 2 groups.
Methods: This study is a retrospective chart review conducted at a tertiary care center. Demographic data; details regarding pessary use; body weight; pelvic organ prolapse stage; and medical, surgical, and obstetrical histories were evaluated. Variables were compared between groups of patients using the t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, χ2 test, and Fisher exact test.
Results: The rate of patients choosing to perform pessary self-care was 31%. The patients in the self-care group were significantly younger (65.0 vs 75.0 years, P < 0.001). Those who were performing self-care were more likely to be premenopausal (6.9% vs 1.5%, P = 0.003), have a lower stage of pelvic organ prolapse (61.3% vs 42.1%, P < 0.001), and more likely to be sexually active (40.5% vs 9.6%, P < 0.001). Those not performing self-care had higher rates of vaginal bleeding (26.0% vs 16.4%, P = 0.012) and erosion (23.5% vs 9.9%, P < 0.001). Self-care patients predominantly used the ring with support pessary, whereas those in the non-self-care group were mostly using the Gellhorn.
Conclusions: Only one third of patients who use a pessary chose to perform self-care. Patients who use self-care are younger, premenopausal, sexually active, and have lower degrees of prolapse. These data can help educate patients on the characteristics more often seen in those choosing self-care. This study highlights the importance of further exploring pessary care preferences and using this information for counseling.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001013 | DOI Listing |
J Robot Surg
December 2024
Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA.
To assess the very long-term functional outcomes and complications of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) at our institution where this robotic technology for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair has been available since 2006. A retrospective review of a cohort of women who underwent a RASC was performed by an investigator not involved in the clinical care of these patients. Women with no electronic medical record follow-up in the last 2 years were contacted by telephone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
November 2024
Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Objectives: This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the findings of published qualitative research exploring the barriers and facilitators to self-management of chronic conditions reported by women.
Design: A systematic literature review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.
Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and PsycInfo was undertaken using the search terms 'Women', 'Woman' 'Female,' 'Chronic', 'Long-term', 'Disease', 'Illness', 'Condition' 'Health,' 'Self-management,' 'Qualitative,' 'Barrier' and 'Facilitator'.
Int Urogynecol J
October 2024
Pelvic Floor Unit, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Introduction And Hypothesis: Vaginal pessaries are the mainstay of the non-surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). A flexible silicone irregular hexagonal (SIH) pessary was developed based on the results of a prior vaginal case study. We hypothesised that the SIH pessary would have a higher rate of retention and self-management than the polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pessary.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrogynecology (Phila)
September 2024
Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Importance: Pessaries are commonly used to manage pelvic organ prolapse. Pessary management can be done by a medical professional or the patient themselves. Pessary complications are rare.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Urogynecol J
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pecs School of Medicine, 17 Edesanyak Str., Pecs, Hungary.
Introduction And Hypothesis: Currently, little is known about how daily self-management of cube pessaries influences sexual function. We hypothesized that removing the cube pessary prior to sexual activity did not negatively influence the sexual function, and pessary self-care did not lead to a deterioration of sexual wellbeing.
Methods: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study in which 214 patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (stage 2+) were enrolled (2015).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!