AI Article Synopsis

  • The 2017 declaration of the opioid epidemic as a public health emergency led to increased attention on effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD), particularly medication options, but studies show that medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is still underused.
  • This research involved interviews with 12 individuals seeking OUD treatment in Tampa, Florida, exploring their attitudes towards MOUD, categorized into positive perceptions, negative perceptions, and overall treatment perspectives.
  • Findings revealed that negative views on MOUD are prevalent, often seen as merely substituting illicit opioids rather than addressing addiction's root causes; these perspectives are influenced by social networks, education levels, and regional cultural acceptance, highlighting the need for targeted education and

Article Abstract

The 2017 declaration of the opioid overdose epidemic as a public health emergency in the United States enhanced a national focus on effective and sustainable treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD), including multiple options utilizing medication. Despite clinical studies demonstrating efficacy, numerous reports suggest that medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has been underutilized, leaving many questions about specific barriers and facilitators. This study examines factors impacting attitudes and perspectives related to MOUD that influence its utilization and acceptance in a state where support for harm reduction and treatment policy has been limited. With consideration for the contextual cultural factors of this region, we conducted twelve individual interviews with people seeking treatment for OUD at a detoxification facility in Tampa, Florida. This study called attention to the perspectives of patients regarding their unique self-identified needs and beliefs around MOUD as it relates to their addiction treatment. We evaluated the perspectives collected in the interviews (N = 12) based on three main themes: 1) positive perceptions of MOUD; 2) negative perceptions of MOUD; and 3) overall perceptions of treatment and recovery. Findings suggest that participants' varying levels of positive and negative perspectives about MOUD are informed by nuances in their social networks and varying levels of exposure or education. For example, participants held more negative opinions of MOUD than positive, accounting mostly for a view that it serves as a direct substitute for illicit opioids rather than a sustainable or supportive solution addressing the underlying causes of addiction. These opinions may be largely dependent on geographic location that dictates policy, practice, funding, and, in turn, cultural acceptance of MOUD. The findings in this qualitative study may help to inform future education efforts, initiatives addressing patient-level concerns, and provide decision-makers with meaningful information to tailor programmatic policy and procedures specific to local area social inputs and resource exposure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128038PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108247DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

opioid disorder
12
moud
8
perspectives moud
8
perceptions moud
8
varying levels
8
perspectives
5
letting sun
4
sun shine
4
shine patient
4
patient voices
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!