Optimal combination of early biomarkers for infection and sepsis diagnosis in the emergency department: The BIPS study.

J Infect

Emergency Department, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Groupe Hospitalier Sorbonne Université, AP-PH, Paris, France; Sorbonne-Université, GRC-14 BIOSFAST, UMR 1166, Paris France. Electronic address:

Published: April 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to identify the most effective combination of biomarkers for diagnosing infection and sepsis in emergency room patients.
  • Researchers evaluated 30 different biomarkers in a cohort of 291 patients suspected of having infections and used advanced statistical methods to determine the optimal combinations.
  • The findings revealed that specific biomarker combinations could accurately distinguish between bacterial and viral infections, achieving high predictive accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.94 and 0.98, respectively.

Article Abstract

Objective: To define the best combination of biomarkers for the diagnosis of infection and sepsis in the emergency room.

Methods: In this prospective study, consecutive patients with a suspicion of infection in the emergency room were included. Eighteen different biomarkers measured in plasma, and twelve biomarkers measured on monocytes, neutrophils, B and T-lymphocytes were studied and the best combinations determined by a gradient tree boosting approach.

Results: Overall, 291 patients were included and analysed, 148 with bacterial infection, and 47 with viral infection. The best biomarker combination which first allowed the diagnosis of bacterial infection, included HLA-DR (human leukocyte antigen DR) on monocytes, MerTk (Myeloid-epithelial-reproductive tyrosine kinase) on neutrophils and plasma metaloproteinase-8 (MMP8) with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.94 [95% confidence interval (IC95): 0.91;0.97]. Among patients in whom a bacterial infection was excluded, the combination of CD64 expression, and CD24 on neutrophils and CX3CR1 on monocytes ended to an AUC = 0.98 [0.96;1] to define those with a viral infection.

Conclusion: In a convenient cohort of patients admitted with a suspicion of infection, two different combinations of plasma and cell surface biomarkers were performant to identify bacterial and viral infection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.02.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bacterial infection
12
infection
9
infection sepsis
8
suspicion infection
8
biomarkers measured
8
viral infection
8
biomarkers
5
optimal combination
4
combination early
4
early biomarkers
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!