Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A total of 104 patients who had undergone neck dissection were examined with respect to disturbance of shoulder function on the operated side. The accessory nerve had been severed in half the patients and preserved in the other half. A dynamo-meter was used to measure the force a patient standing upright could exert in pulling upward with his arm outstretched. The relative loss of strength after neck dissection was determined by relating the difference between the two sides to the strength of the healthy shoulder. On average, the loss of strength in the operated shoulder was significantly less after preservation of the accessory nerve than after its severance. An additional influence due to tumour stage or postoperative irradiation was not found. The functional loss determined by the difference quotient correlated well with the patients' subjective account of their functional impairment. Preservation of the eleventh cranial nerve is discussed with respect to the question of increased risk of lymph node recurrence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!