National Trends in Cervical Cancer Screening in Adolescents.

J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Published: October 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined cervical cancer screening patterns among adolescents aged 14-20 before and after the 2009 ACOG recommendations, using data from National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (2005-2016).
  • The results revealed that while the screening rate for females aged 14-20 dropped from 4.5% to 0.4% over the years studied, older adolescents and those visiting gynecologists were more likely to be screened.
  • The research highlighted regional differences, finding that living in the Southern U.S. increased the likelihood of screening, whereas having public insurance decreased it, indicating ongoing issues with adherence to updated screening guidelines.

Article Abstract

Study Objective: To characterize patterns of cervical cancer screening among adolescents ages 14-20 years before and after the 2009 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommendations.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 2005-2016 data.

Participants: Female adolescents and young women ages 14-26 years.

Interventions: Multivariable logistic regression models identified independent predictors of unindicated cervical cancer screening at office-based visits among adolescents ages 14-20 years.

Main Outcome Measures: Cervical cancer screening in women ages 14-20 and 21-26 years in 2 time periods: 2005-2008 and 2009-2016.

Results: Between 2005 and 2016, 11,768 office visits were among adolescents ages 14-20 years. Overall, the cervical cancer screening rate for young women ages 14-20 years was 4.0%, which decreased from 4.5% to 0.4% (P = .008) during the study period. Adolescents who received cervical cancer screening during an office visit were older (18-20 years: 24.1% vs 14-17 years: 8.2%; P < .001), had a preventive care visit (preventive care: 79.7% vs other visit types: 20.3%; P < .001), and saw an obstetrician/gynecologist (obstetrician/gynecologist: 74.81% vs other specialties: 25.1%; P < .001). After adjusting for age, year, period, insurance status, region, and provider type, screening for cervical cancer was associated with living in the Southern region of the United States (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.25; P = .02) and public insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47, 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.64; P < .001).

Conclusion: Despite recommendations, cervical cancer screening continued to occur in the adolescent population-especially older adolescents-creating unnecessary costs and potential harms. These findings show a slow uptake of guidelines nationally and the need for initiatives that encourage implementation of performance measures for providers, including ongoing provider and patient education.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2021.02.097DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical cancer
32
cancer screening
28
ages 14-20
20
adolescents ages
12
14-20 years
12
women ages
12
cervical
8
cancer
8
screening
8
screening adolescents
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!