AI Article Synopsis

  • Accurate estimation of polyp size is crucial for determining treatment and monitoring intervals in colorectal care, yet many endoscopists make these estimations incorrectly without realizing it.
  • A study involving 261 endoscopists in Japan assessed how experience influenced their ability to size polyps, revealing that those with fewer colonoscopy procedures performed in the past year were more likely to misjudge sizes.
  • Results showed that inexperienced endoscopists tended to overestimate polyp sizes significantly more than their experienced counterparts, highlighting the need for better training and awareness in size estimation.

Article Abstract

Background And Aim: Accurate polyp size estimation is essential in deciding the therapeutic strategy of colorectal polyps and endoscopic surveillance intervals. However, many endoscopists frequently make incorrect size estimations without being aware of their errors. This cross-sectional study aimed to clarify the characteristics of endoscopists associated with inaccurate estimation.

Methods: We previously conducted a web trial involving 261 endoscopists in 51 institutions in Japan to assess their ability to estimate polyp size. Participants answered questions about polyp size using visual estimates in a test involving images of 30 polyps. Here, we investigated the relationships between inaccurate size estimation and the backgrounds of participants. The rates of overestimation and underestimation of polyp size were also compared to clarify any trends in the answers of participants with low accuracy (< 50%).

Results: Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of colonoscopic procedures in the past year was the only factor associated with a low accuracy of polyp size estimation (odds ratio 0.750, 95% confidence interval 0.609-0.925; P = 0.007). Endoscopists with low accuracy had a greater tendency to overestimate polyp size (42.3% overestimation and 21.2% underestimation, P < 0.001) compared with other endoscopists (16.6% overestimation and 17.9% underestimation, P = 0.951).

Conclusions: Endoscopists with limited experience of colonoscopy in the past year were more likely to make frequent errors in size estimation. Furthermore, endoscopists making inaccurate size estimations had a propensity to overestimate polyp size.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15464DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

polyp size
16
size estimation
12
associated inaccurate
8
inaccurate size
8
colorectal polyps
8
cross-sectional study
8
size
7
factors associated
4
estimation colorectal
4
polyps multicenter
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!