Introduction: Due to higher morbidity and mortality, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) causes many public health problems.
Aim: To observe effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) and ischemic postconditioning (IPC) on patients diagnosed as STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).
Material And Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted using indirect comparison by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). We conducted searches by utilizing PubMed and the other databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that described IPC or RIC treated patients diagnosed with STEMI during processes of pPCI. Enzymatic infarct size and infarction size were evaluated and cardiac events were assessed during the follow-up.
Results: Pooled results showed that lower enzymatic infarction size was associated with the RIC group compared to the IPC group (IPC . RIC: standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.126; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.756-1.677). Compared with IPC, RIC significantly reduced infarction size, which was assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (SMD = 1.113; 95% CI: 0.674-1.837). We noted a potential toward greater complete ST-segment resolution in RIC patients compared with IPC patients (odds ratio (OR) = 0.821; 95% CI: 0.166-4.051). No significant difference existed in all-cause mortality (OR = 2.211; 95% CI: 0.845-5.784), Target vessel revascularization (TVR) (OR = 0.045; 95% CI: 0.001-.662) or re-infarction (OR = 1.763; 95% CI: 0.741-4.193).
Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggested RIC was correlated with significantly smaller infarction size compared to IPC. No significant superiority between RIC and IPC has been observed in this study on cSTR incidence, mortality and re-infarction or TVR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7863805 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aic.2020.99262 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!