The 5 Pillars in Tourette Syndrome Deep Brain Stimulation Patient Selection: Present and Future.

Neurology

From the Department of Clinical Neurosciences (D.M., T.M.P.), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute (D.M., T.M.P.), University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (D.M.), University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada; Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education (D.M., T.M.P.), Calgary, AB, Canada; UMass Memorial Medical Center and UMass Medical School (W.D.), Worcester, MA, United States; Department of Neurology (J.J.-S.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Neurology (I.M., M.S.O.), Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, United States; Department of Psychiatry (T.M.P.), Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease (A.F.), Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Krembil Brain Institute (A.F.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; CenteR for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA) (A.F.), Toronto, ON, Canada; Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit (C.G.), Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Department of Neurology, Berlin, Germany; and Strategic Regulatory Partners (W.W.), LLC.

Published: April 2021

The selection of patients with Tourette syndrome (TS) for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery rests on 5 fundamental pillars. However, the operationalization of the multidisciplinary screening process to evaluate these pillars remains highly diverse, especially across sites. High tic severity and tic-related impact on quality of life (first 2 pillars) require confirmation from objective, validated measures, but malignant features of TS should per se suffice to fulfill this pillar. Failure of behavioral and pharmacologic therapies (third pillar) should be assessed taking into account refractoriness through objective and subjective measures supporting lack of efficacy of all interventions of proven efficacy, as well as true lack of tolerability, adherence, or access. Educational interventions and use of remote delivery formats (for behavioral therapies) play a role in preventing misjudgment of treatment failure. Stability of comorbid psychiatric disorders for 6 months (fourth pillar) is needed to confirm the predominant impact of tics on quality of life, to prevent pseudo-refractoriness, and to maximize the future DBS response. The 18-year age limit (fifth pillar) is currently under reappraisal, considering the potential impact of severe tics in adolescence and the predictive effect of tic severity in childhood on tic severity when transitioning into adulthood. Future advances should aim at a consensus-based definition of failure of specific, noninvasive treatment strategies for tics and of the minimum clinical observation period before considering DBS treatment, the stability of behavioral comorbidities, and the use of a prospective international registry data to identify predictors of positive response to DBS, especially in younger patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8105965PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011704DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tic severity
12
tourette syndrome
8
syndrome deep
8
deep brain
8
brain stimulation
8
quality life
8
pillars
4
pillars tourette
4
stimulation patient
4
patient selection
4

Similar Publications

Approximately 20%-40% of individuals with Tourette syndrome (TS) have rage attacks (RAs), which are recurrent, explosive behavioral outbursts that can cause significant functional impairment. Despite the impact of RA in TS, there has been limited research on treatment, and most studies have focused on pharmacologic interventions. Nonpharmacologic interventions have the potential to improve symptoms with fewer side effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: Ecopipam is a selective antagonist of the dopamine D1 receptor, and its efficacy and safety have recently been explored in several clinical trials involving patients with Tourette syndrome (TS). The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the pooled estimate for efficacy [in terms of reduction in tic Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) scores] and safety of oral ecopipam in subjects with TS.

Methods: All clinical trials that explored the efficacy and/or safety of ecopipam in patients with TS were included to determine the pooled estimate for change in YGTSS, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-TS, and the severity of comorbid attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD), obsessive compulsion disorder (OCD), and depressive symptoms, as well as the nature and frequency of adverse effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Death in the early phase of trauma is primarily attributable to uncontrolled bleeding exacerbated by trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC). A comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence on interventions for TIC is needed.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of blood component products and tranexamic acid administrations for severe trauma patients with TIC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Gut microbiota plays an important role in tic disorders (TDs); however, clinical research on probiotics for chronic TDs treatment is lacking. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of probiotics, hypothesizing that their clinical efficacy is comparable to that of clonidine in treating chronic TDs.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Limosilactobacillus reuteri or clonidine transdermal patch treatment for 8 weeks while maintaining their existing treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome (GTS) is a chronic tic disorder, characterized by unwanted motor actions and vocalizations. While brain stimulation techniques show promise in reducing tic severity, optimal target networks are not well-defined. Here, we leverage datasets from two independent deep brain stimulation (DBS) cohorts and a cohort of tic-inducing lesions to infer critical networks for treatment and occurrence of tics by mapping stimulation sites and lesions to a functional connectome derived from 1,000 healthy participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!