Introduction: Women have historically been under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including many landmark RCTs that established standards of care. In light of this fact, some modern researchers are calling for replication of earlier landmark trials with women only. This approach is ethically concerning, in that it would require some enrolled women to be deprived of treatments that are currently considered standard of care.
Objective: In an attempt to better understand the justification of a women-only approach to designing clinical trials, this study looks to systematically categorise the number of women-only RCTs for conditions that affect both men and women and the reasons given within the medical and philosophical literatures to perform them.
Methodology: This scoping review of the literature will search, screen and select articles based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria, after which a grounded theory approach will be used to synthesise the data. It is expected that there will be a variety of reasons given for why a women-only trial may be justified. Electronic databases that will be searched include MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, Web of Science Proceedings, ClinicalTrials.gov, Philosopher's Index, Phil Papers, JSTOR, Periodicals Archive Online, Project MUSE and the National Reference Centre for Bioethics.
Significance: The scope of this study is to determine published rationales used to justify women-only randomised trials, both in the case of new trials and in the repetition of landmark trials.
Ethics And Dissemination: Research ethics board approval is not required for this study as there is no participant involvement. Results will be published as a stand-alone manuscript and will inform a larger project related to the ethics of a women-only RCT of carotid intervention for women with symptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7888323 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043370 | DOI Listing |
Sleep Med
December 2024
Center of Excellence for Sleep & Circadian Research, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address:
BMC Health Serv Res
October 2024
Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA.
Background: In Africa, dispensing oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) within already strained public health facilities has led to prolonged waiting periods and suboptimal experiences for clients. We sought to explore the acceptability of dispensing PrEP semiannually with interim HIV self-testing (HIVST) versus quarterly PrEP dispensing with clinic-based HIV testing to optimize clinic-delivered PrEP services.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative study within a non-inferiority individual-level randomized controlled trial testing the effect of six-monthly PrEP dispensing with HIVST compared to the standard-of-care three-monthly PrEP dispensing on PrEP clinical outcomes in Kenya (ClinicalTrials.
Body Image
December 2024
Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
Self-objectification can influence cognitive and motor task performance by causing resources to be reallocated towards monitoring the body. The present study investigated effects of recalling positive or negative body-related experiences on visuomotor adaptation in women and men. Moderating effects of positive and negative affect were also explored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiovasc Dev Dis
August 2024
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pain manifestation following coronary artery disease (CAD) disease differs between men and women. Here, we aimed to provide evidence favoring possible differences in pain manifestation between men and women following CAD using Mendelian randomization (MR). We used summary-level data from sex-stratified genome-wide association studies on CAD and self-reported and clinically diagnosed chest, neck and shoulder, back, and facial pain using data from the UK Biobank cohort ( > 450,000) followed by two-sample MR (sensitivity) analyses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Men reporting same-sex behaviors are disproportionately impacted by sexually transmitted infections (STI). Differences in clinical characteristics and STIs in men who have sex with men only (MSMO), with men and women (MSMW), and with women only (MSW) are not well described.
Methods: First visits to two Baltimore City STI clinics 2011-2016 from MSMO and MSMW compared to an age-matched random sample of MSW were analyzed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!