AI Article Synopsis

  • Vascular complications are a significant concern after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), prompting researchers to explore ways to improve patient outcomes.
  • This study assessed the effectiveness of using an Angio-Seal (AS) device alongside suture-based devices (SBDs) for improving endovascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, focusing on major complications and bleeding rates.
  • Results showed that patients receiving the combined AS and SBD treatment had significantly lower rates of major bleeding and vascular complications, along with cost savings and a greater likelihood of being discharged the next day, without affecting overall mortality rates.

Article Abstract

Background: Vascular complications still represent an important issue after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of upfront use of an adjunctive Angio-Seal (AS) plug-based system on top of suture-based devices (SBDs) for endovascular haemostasis after transfemoral (TF) TAVI.

Methods: From January 2019 to April 2020, 332 consecutive patients with preprocedural computed tomography angiography (CTA) assessment underwent fully percutaneous TF-TAVI. The primary outcomes were 30-day major vascular complications and major or life-threatening (LT) bleeding due to endovascular closure system failure. A total of 246 TF-TAVI patients (123 pairs), undergoing either isolated SBD or SBD+AS, were matched using the propensity-score method.

Results: At 30 days, patients receiving SBD+AS had lower rates of major/LT bleeding (1.6% vs 8.9%, odds ratio [OR] 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04-0.78; p<0.01) and major vascular complications (1.6% vs 8.9%, OR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.78; p<0.01). In addition, the use of SBD+AS was associated with a significant cost saving related to the vascular event (mean difference -315.3 € per patient, 95% CI: -566.4 € to -64.1 €; p=0.01), and a higher probability of next-day discharge (NDD) after TAVI (30.9% vs 16.3%, OR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.25-4.25; p<0.01). No difference in all-cause 30-day mortality was observed (3.3% vs 1.6% for SBD and SBD+AS groups, respectively, OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.09-2.74; p=0.41).

Conclusions: An upfront combined strategy with an additional AS plug-based device on top of SBDs was shown to reduce major vascular complications and major/LT bleeding due to closure system failure after TF-TAVI. This approach was associated with a cost saving and with a higher probability of NDD compared to the use of isolated SBD. Visual summary. Effectiveness of the upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation using Angio-Seal on top of a suture-based device (SBD) versus the isolated use of SBD. LT: life-threatening; TF-TAVI: transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724957PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01125DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endovascular haemostasis
8
haemostasis transfemoral
8
transcatheter aortic
8
aortic valve
8
valve implantation
8
vascular complications
8
upfront combined
4
combined strategy
4
strategy endovascular
4
transfemoral transcatheter
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!