Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are monitored in Italy through a national surveillance system. A 4-element bundle was introduced in 2012, consisting of: appropriate preoperative shower and hair removal, perioperative normothermia, and antibiotic prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the intervention on SSI rates after colon surgery.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2008 and 2019 in 29 hospitals of northern Italy. An interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was modeled to assess the bundle's impact on SSI trends. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of SSI among procedures performed in the postintervention period, comparing full and partial bundle compliance.

Results: Data of 5487 colon surgery procedures were collected (1243 preintervention and 4244 postintervention). The ITSA identified a significant change in the monthly postintervention SSI trend of -0.19% and a change in level of -2.09%. A significant protective effect of full bundle compliance compared to partial bundle compliance (OR 0.74, P.043) was found, whereas the single effect of the bundle elements was nonsignificant.

Conclusions: Results of this study suggest this relatively simple bundle protocol is effective in reducing SSI risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.02.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interrupted time
8
time series
8
series analysis
8
surgical site
8
site infections
8
colon surgery
8
partial bundle
8
bundle compliance
8
bundle
7
ssi
5

Similar Publications

Introduction: We describe the safety of sotorasib monotherapy in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discuss practical recommendations for managing key risks.

Methods: Incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were pooled from 4 clinical trials: CodeBreaK 100 (NCT03600883), CodeBreaK 101 (NCT04185883), CodeBreaK 105 (NCT04380753), and CodeBreaK 200 (NCT04303780) and graded according to CTCAE v5.0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bullying Behaviors in Clinical Settings: Potentially Harmful Distractions.

Nurs Educ Perspect

January 2025

About the Authors Dawna Rutherford, PhD, RN, adjunct clinical instructor, Salem State University, Salem, Massachusetts, is with Staff Nurse/Traveler RN Network, Nome, Alaska. Gordon Lee Gillespie, PhD, DNP, RN, was professor, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, when this study was conducted. He is currently chief program officer, National League for Nursing. Scott Bresler, PhD, was clinical director, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, when this study was conducted. Kimberly Johnson, PhD, RN, CEN, and Carolyn R. Smith, PhD, RN, CNE, are associate professors, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati. This study was funded by an award to Dr. Rutherford from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health through the Pilot Research Project Training Program of the University of Cincinnati Education and Research Center Grant #T42OH008432. For more information, contact Dr. Gillespie at

Nursing students exposed to bullying behaviors are at risk for making medication errors. For a quasi-experimental study, 15 prelicensure nursing students at a Midwestern university were exposed to simulated bullying behaviors or common distractions while administering medications in a laboratory setting. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!