In this article, an analysis of the existing literature is carried out. It focused on the netiquette (country, date, objectives, methodological design, main variables, sample details, and measurement methods) included in the Web of Science and Scopus databases. This systematic review of the literature has been developed entirely according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). The initial search yielded 53 results, of which 18 exceeded the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. These results show that this is a poorly defined line of research, both in theory and in practice. There is a need to update the theoretical framework and an analysis of the empirical proposals, whose samples are supported by students or similar. Knowing, understanding, and analyzing netiquette is a necessity in a society in which information and communication technologies (ICT) have changed the way of socializing and communicating. A new reality in which there is cyber-bullying, digital scams, fake news, and haters on social networks.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7908275 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031212 | DOI Listing |
Future Oncol
March 2022
Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Social media growth has revolutionized health care, facilitating user-friendly, rapid and global sharing of content. Within oncology, this allows for new frontiers in communication for cancer patients, caregivers and healthcare providers. As more physicians engage in online spaces, it is imperative that there are resources to assist in establishing a professional presence on social media.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Educ Health Promot
February 2021
Department of Medical, Student Research Committed, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Background: Considering the importance of virtual professionalism and professional ethics in medical sciences, and the necessity to pay attention to this issue and its impact on medical professionalism, this study aimed to build a professional culture questionnaire in a virtual environment for students of medical sciences in Iran.
Materials And Methods: This is an exploratory, sequential, mixed-methods research which was conducted in three sections. In the first section, the concept of e-professionalism in medical sciences was analyzed using the hybrid concept analysis in the theoretical work, field work, and final analysis stages in order to extract information related to the concept.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
January 2021
Department of Didactics and School Organization, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain.
In this article, an analysis of the existing literature is carried out. It focused on the netiquette (country, date, objectives, methodological design, main variables, sample details, and measurement methods) included in the Web of Science and Scopus databases. This systematic review of the literature has been developed entirely according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Educ
July 2007
Central Educational Support Unit, Catholic University of Leuven (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), Leuven, Belgium.
Objectives: The quality of computer-mediated asynchronous group discussion in educational settings often has potential for improvement. To this end, 2 categories of recommendations can be found in the literature. Some authors advise providing didactic guidelines to students.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAWHONN Lifelines
November 2000
University of Buffalo, State University of New York, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!