A deep-learning semantic segmentation approach to fully automated MRI-based left-ventricular deformation analysis in cardiotoxicity.

Magn Reson Imaging

Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, 1700 Center Street, Mobile, AL 36604, United States of America.

Published: May 2021

Left-ventricular (LV) strain measurements with the Displacement Encoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) MRI sequence provide accurate estimates of cardiotoxicity damage related to breast cancer chemotherapy. This study investigated an automated LV chamber quantification tool via segmentation with a supervised deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) before strain analysis with DENSE images. Segmentation for chamber quantification analysis was conducted with a custom DeepLabV3+ DCNN with ResNet-50 backbone on 42 female breast cancer datasets (22 training-sets, eight validation-sets and 12 independent test-sets). Parameters such as LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and ejection fraction (LVEF) were quantified, and myocardial strains analyzed with the Radial Point Interpolation Method (RPIM). Myocardial classification was validated against ground-truth with sensitivity-specificity analysis, the metrics of Dice, average perpendicular distance (APD) and Hausdorff-distance. Following segmentation, validation was conducted with the Cronbach's Alpha (C-Alpha) intraclass correlation coefficient between LV chamber quantification results with DENSE and Steady State Free Precession (SSFP) acquisitions and a vendor tool-based method to segment the DENSE data, and similarly for myocardial strain analysis in the chambers. The results of myocardial classification from segmentation of the DENSE data were accuracy = 97%, Dice = 0.89 and APD = 2.4 mm in the test-set. The C-Alpha correlations from comparing chamber quantification results between the segmented DENSE and SSFP data and vendor tool-based method were 0.97 for LVEF (56 ± 7% vs 55 ± 7% vs 55 ± 6%, p = 0.6) and 0.77 for LVEDD (4.6 ± 0.4 cm vs 4.5 ± 0.3 cm vs 4.5 ± 0.3 cm, p = 0.8). The validation metrics against ground-truth and equivalent parameters obtained from the SSFP segmentation and vendor tool-based comparisons show that the DCNN approach is applicable for automated LV chamber quantification and subsequent strain analysis in cardiotoxicity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103654PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2021.01.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chamber quantification
20
strain analysis
12
vendor tool-based
12
analysis cardiotoxicity
8
breast cancer
8
automated chamber
8
myocardial classification
8
tool-based method
8
dense data
8
segmentation
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!