A Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Therapy in Adults in Coarctation of Aorta.

Background: Transcatheter stent therapy provides similar acute reduction in coarctation of aorta (COA) gradient and systolic blood pressure (SBP) as compared with surgery. However, there are limited data comparing mid-term outcomes after transcatheter vs surgical therapy for COA. The purpose of this study was to compare temporal changes in Doppler COA gradient and SBP after transcatheter stent therapy versus surgical therapy for COA.

Methods: A retrospective study of COA patients (≥18 years old) undergoing transcatheter stent therapy or surgical therapy at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota from 2000-2018 was performed. Linear regression analyses were used to compare temporal changes in Doppler gradient and SBP between the 2 groups. Propensity matching was used to adjust for between-group differences in clinical and anatomic characteristics.

Results: A total of 44 and 128 patients underwent transcatheter and surgical therapy, respectively; there were no significant between-group differences in the anatomy of the thoracic aorta. Both groups had similar acute reduction in Doppler peak gradient (P=.66), mean gradient (P=.41), SBP (P=.22), and upper-to-lower extremity SBP (ULE-SBP) gradient (P=.69). The median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range, 27-81 months) and 63 months (interquartile range, 41-94 months) in the transcatheter and surgical groups, respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in the temporal change in Doppler peak gradient (P-interaction=.06), mean gradient (P-interaction=.15), SBP (P-interaction=.20), and ULE-SBP gradient (P-interaction=.51).

Conclusions: These favorable short- and mid-term outcome data support the use of transcatheter therapy as an alternative to surgery in adults with COA. Further studies are required to determine if these favorable outcomes are maintained on long-term follow-up.