AI Article Synopsis

  • Robotic surgery is becoming popular in urology, but most ureter surgeries are still done with older methods because it's unclear if robots are better and the robots can’t feel what they’re operating on.
  • Some studies show that robotic surgery might be good for certain complicated conditions in adults, but most reports focus on kids and problems they were born with.
  • More research is needed to see if robotic surgery is really better for everyone, but there are signs that it could be a good option, especially with special techniques and aiming tools that help with surgery.

Article Abstract

Despite the rapid increase in the use of robotic surgery in urology, the majority of ureteric reconstruction procedures are still performed using laparoscopic or open approaches. This is primarily due to uncertainty regarding the advantages of robotic approaches over conventional ones, and the unique difficulty in identifying the specific area of interest due to the lack of tactile feedback from the current robotic systems. However, with the potential benefits of minimal invasiveness, several pioneering reports have been published on robotic surgery in urology. By reviewing the literature on this topic, we aimed to summarize the techniques, considerations, and consistent findings regarding robotic ureteral reconstruction in adults. Robotic applications for ureteral surgery have been primarily reported for pediatric urology, especially in the context of relieving a congenital obstruction in the ureteral pelvic junction. However, contemporary studies have also consistently demonstrated that robotic surgery could be a reliable option for malignant, iatrogenic, and traumatic conditions, which generally occur in adult patients. Nevertheless, the lack of comparative studies on heterogeneous hosts and disease conditions make it difficult to determine the benefit of the robotic approach over the conventional approach in the general population; thus, qualified prospective trials are needed for wider acceptance. However, contemporary reports have demonstrated that the robotic approach could be an alternative option for ureteral construction, even in the absence of haptic feedback, which can be compensated by various surgical techniques and enhanced three-dimensional visualization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859418PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2020.11.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

robotic surgery
12
robotic
9
ureteral reconstruction
8
surgical techniques
8
surgery urology
8
demonstrated robotic
8
robotic approach
8
robot-assisted ureteral
4
reconstruction adult
4
adult narrative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!