Video-assisted versus open thoracotomy lobectomy: comparison on lymphadenectomy and survival in early stage of lung cancer.

Background: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is increasingly used in the surgical treatment of early lung cancer, but the oncological benefits are still controversial. We aimed to compare video-assisted lobectomy and open thoracotomy lobectomy in terms of lymphadenectomy and long-term survival depending on the location of lobectomy.

Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study was based on the Polish Lung Cancer Study Group and included patients with stage I lung cancer who were surgically treated between 2007 and 2015. We included 1410 patients after video-assisted lobectomy and 4,855 after open thoracotomy.

Results: The average number of lymph nodes removed in video-assisted lobectomy was 10.9 and in open thoracotomy lobectomy was 12.9 (P<0.001). The 5-year survival was better in the video-assisted lobectomy group (78.6%) compared to open thoracotomy (73.8%) (P=0.002). Significant differences were found in the case of left lower lobe and left upper lobe lobectomies. Multivariable analysis showed that the prognostic factors for open thoracotomy relative to video-assisted lobectomy are: age over 60 [HR (95% CI): 1.55 (1.17-2.05), P=0.002], female [HR (95% CI): 1.57 (1.07-2.29), P=0.02], squamous cell carcinoma [HR (95% CI): 1.63 (1.12-2.37), P=0.011], left lower lobe [HR (95% CI): 2.69 (1.37-5.27), P=0.004] and left upper lobe [HR (95% CI): 1.53 (1.01-2.33), P=0.047].

Conclusions: The study showed that the number of lymph nodes removed during video-assisted lobectomy is significantly lower than in the open thoracotomy group. The long-term video-assisted lobectomy results were significantly better compared to open thoracotomy. Better long-term results were achieved on the left side of lobectomy.