A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Assessment of Correlation between Craniofacial Proportions and Genetic Indicators. | LitMetric

Assessment of Correlation between Craniofacial Proportions and Genetic Indicators.

J Contemp Dent Pract

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Al Ameen Dental College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India.

Published: September 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the relationship between craniofacial proportions and genetic markers related to estrogen receptors (ESR1 and ESR2) in orthodontic patients aged 12-18.
  • A total of 128 patients were examined using lateral cephalograms and DNA analysis to assess specific genetic indicators.
  • Results indicated that certain genotypes of ESR2 and ESR1 showed significant correlations with various craniofacial measurements, highlighting the potential impact of these genetic markers on facial structure.

Article Abstract

Aim And Objective: To assess correlation among craniofacial proportions and genetic indicators using estrogen receptors (ESR1 and ESR2).

Materials And Methods: A total of 128 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with age range 12-18 years of both genders were included. Lateral cephalogram of all subjects were taken. Vertical and sagittal parameters were studied on these cephalogram. Saliva was used for DNA extraction. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed for assessment of genetic indicators in ESR1 (rs9340799 and rs2234693) and in ESR2 (rs4986938 and rs1256049).

Results: The mean SN cranial base was 68.4 mm, ANB (sagittal jaw relationship) was 2.8°, Ptm-A maxillary length was 46.2 mm, Go-Pg (mandibular body length) was 68.2 mm, Co-Gn (total mandibular length) was 112.8 mm, lower anterior facial height (ANS-Me) was 58.4 mm, N-Me (total anterior facial height) was 108.4 mm, lower posterior facial height (Co-Go) was 58.7 mm, and S-Go (total posterior facial height) was 72.4 mm. It was found that rs4986938 in ESR2 was linked with S-N dimension, with patients having CC genotype possessing negative correlation values ( value 0.05). Similarly, CC genotype possessed minimum mandibular body dimension, and it was found that rs4986938 in ESR2 was also linked with Go-Pg dimension ( value = 0.02). We found reduction in the ANS-Me values in patients with CC genotype in ESR1 rs2234693 ( value = 0.02), whereas there was no correlation of rest genotype with other craniofacial measurements ( value > 0.05).

Conclusion: Evaluation of ESR1 and ESR2 may show role of genetic markers in disparity of craniofacial dimensions in individuals.

Clinical Significance: This study provides an outlay and supports the concept of possible correlation between genetic markers and craniofacial measurements.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facial height
16
genetic indicators
12
correlation craniofacial
8
craniofacial proportions
8
proportions genetic
8
mandibular body
8
anterior facial
8
posterior facial
8
rs4986938 esr2
8
esr2 linked
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!