Purpose: The aim of this review was to compare clinical and radiological outcome of acromio-clavicular joint reconstruction with allografts versus autografts.

Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and WEB OF SCIENCE databases were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines until February 2020 using the terms: 'coracoclavicular' OR 'coraco-clavicular' OR 'acromioclavicular' OR 'acromio-clavicular joint', AND 'reconstruction'. All studies reporting on clinical and radiological outcome as well as complications after ACJ reconstruction using allo- and/or autografts were included.

Results: A total of 29 articles, including 2 prospective and 27 retrospective studies, involving 622 patients, reconstructed with either allo- (n = 360) or auto-grafts (n = 262), for acromio-clavicular joint instability were identified and included in this review. The majority of studies had low sample sizes (66.7% below n = 20), were retrospective (93.3%), with short-term follow-ups (average 26.2 ± 12.6 months; range 6-186). The study with the largest sample size (n = 128) did not report clinical outcome. A comparison between allo- and auto-graft showed no significant differences regarding age, gender, and follow-up times. Clinical outcome was comparable in both groups, loss of reduction (LOR) and complication rates were higher in the allograft group. Overall a reduction of LOR was shown if additional horizontal stabilization was performed. Also a higher LOR and revision rate was documented in allografts without suture or suture-tape augmentation. The use of more clavicular drill-holes correlated with a higher frequency of fracture.

Conclusions: A systematic review of the available peer-reviewed literature addressing allograft and autograft reconstruction of unstable coracoclavicular ligaments shows that the published studies are generally of low quality with low levels of evidence. The published literature shows no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the use of autografts or allografts in ACJ reconstruction surgery. Surgical techniques utilizing additional horizontal stabilization may contribute to lower rates of LOR. In cases where allograft tissue is used for ACJ reconstruction the use of suture/tape augmentation may reduce LOR rates as well as revision rates.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06445-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acj reconstruction
12
joint reconstruction
8
systematic review
8
clinical radiological
8
radiological outcome
8
acromio-clavicular joint
8
clinical outcome
8
reduction lor
8
additional horizontal
8
horizontal stabilization
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CLR) technique, popular for treating acromioclavicular joint dislocations, has potential complications like clavicle and coracoid fractures, and implant failures, prompting a study on clavicular tunnel widening (CTW).
  • A retrospective analysis of 84 patients from a larger group who underwent single-bundle CLR provided data on post-operative measures, including CT width and coracoclavicular distance at 6 months.
  • The findings indicated that both CT width and coracoclavicular distance increased significantly by the 6-month follow-up, but no notable differences in CTW were observed based on factors like sex, injury causes, or Rockwood classification.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • ACJ disruption is common in athletes but understanding the biomechanics and treatment effects (surgery vs. nonoperative) on shoulder movement remains limited due to insufficient measurement techniques.
  • This study aimed to use dynamic stereo x-ray (DSX) imaging to analyze ACJ movement, comparing outcomes between surgically reconstructed shoulders, nonoperatively treated shoulders, and their uninjured counterparts.
  • A controlled laboratory study was conducted with participants who had unilateral ACJ surgeries, assessing movement, range of motion, and strength using advanced imaging and statistical methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

High-grade the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations can be treated surgically. Endoscopic techniques to stabilize the ACJ using an EndoButton suture technique for coracoclavicular (CC) fixation have been shown to be safe and reproducible. Several studies have demonstrated the benefit of stabilizing the ACJ to reduce postoperative horizontal instability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Various techniques are available for the reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations, with the main focus being on restoration of the AC capsule or coracoclavicular ligaments. Recent research has underlined the significance of the deltotrapezial fascia (DTF) and related muscles as dynamic stabilizers of the ACJ. The Hypothesis was that a reconstruction of the DTF increases the stability of the ACJ in the horizontal plane more than a complete transection of the fascia, while not restoring the stability of the native state.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Fixation failure and early loss of reduction with the use of suture anchors for surgical repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case series.

JSES Int

September 2024

Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • * Three male patients with Rockwood type 3 and type 5 ACJ dislocations underwent surgery using suture anchors and grafts; however, all experienced complications such as loss of reduction and anchor pullout.
  • * The findings indicate a significant rate of fixation failures and early complications, suggesting that caution should be used when choosing implants for ACJ dislocation treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!