A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Laser-Assisted Rhinoplasty: The Future Generation Rhinoplasty Technique to Preserve Anatomy? A Series of Patients Compared to Patients Undergoing Standard Open Rhinoplasty. | LitMetric

Laser-Assisted Rhinoplasty: The Future Generation Rhinoplasty Technique to Preserve Anatomy? A Series of Patients Compared to Patients Undergoing Standard Open Rhinoplasty.

Plast Reconstr Surg

From the Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery Unit, Policlinico G.B. Rossi University of Verona; private practice; and the Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Anatomy and Histology Section; and Dental Clinic and Maxillofacial Department, University of Verona.

Published: February 2021

Background: Rhinoplasty is the cosmetic procedure that is most difficult to master. Anatomical preservation should represent the main goal of rhinoplasty. One emerging tool appears to be erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser bone and cartilage reshaping. The authors developed a new small laser hand probe to perform what we called laser-assisted rhinoplasty. The authors evaluate the feasibility of the laser-assisted rhinoplasty and the aesthetic and functional result of laser-assisted rhinoplasty compared to classic rhinoplasty.

Methods: A total of 50 patients were enrolled and randomized into two cohorts: the first cohort of patients was submitted to classic rhinoplasty, and the second cohort to laser-assisted rhinoplasty. The laser beam was used to perform both the resection of the crura and the resection of the nasal hump and osteotomies.

Results: Laser-assisted rhinoplasty is a safe and reproducible technique. At a clinical assessment, lateral crura reshaping showed a visible step or excessive skin retraction in 12 percent of the classic rhinoplasty population with thick cartilage and/or thin skin, and this was not present in the laser-assisted rhinoplasty population at 12-month follow-up. The patient satisfaction rate was higher in the laser-assisted rhinoplasty population compared with standard open rhinoplasty. The authors also clinically noted a reduction in edema in the immediate postoperative period in the laser-assisted rhinoplasty population and a more rapid complete resolution of the swelling.

Conclusion: The laser-assisted rhinoplasty technique is feasible and safe and has no major complication, and the aesthetic and functional results can be superimposed onto classic rhinoplasty but with a higher degree of intraoperative precision, higher patient satisfaction, a cleaner field, and less bleeding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007590DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laser-assisted rhinoplasty
40
rhinoplasty
17
rhinoplasty population
16
classic rhinoplasty
12
laser-assisted
10
rhinoplasty technique
8
standard open
8
open rhinoplasty
8
rhinoplasty authors
8
aesthetic functional
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!