A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_sessiont6h6s3l237v7l1lph43s77r5cfq2jupa): Failed to open stream: No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 177

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 137

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 143

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3098
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Attempt to read property "Count" on bool

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 3100

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3100
Function: _error_handler

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Trapping (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Other Beetles in Flourmills: Evaluating Fumigation Efficacy and Estimating Population Density. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • ! The study examined common beetle pests in two flourmills over one to two years using pheromone-baited traps to understand their distribution and activity in relation to fumigation treatments.
  • ! In flourmill 1, one specific beetle species was the most frequently trapped, while in flourmill 2, two other species were captured more frequently; overall captures increased in the second year likely due to trap modifications.
  • ! Fumigation treatments reduced beetle captures, but didn’t eliminate populations completely, suggesting that they may have been ineffective or that new beetles were entering the mills shortly after fumigation.

Article Abstract

This paper reports beetle pests common to flourmills targeted during a series of trapping studies over a two-year period in flourmill 1 and a one year period in flourmill 2. Objectives were (1) use pheromone-baited traps to detect (Herbst) and other pest species present for their distribution over space and time, (2) monitor activity before and after fumigations to assess efficacy of the treatment, and (3) correlate counts of via trap capture against direct counts from samples of the milled flour to assess the value of trap data to estimate relative size of the pest population. Traps were deployed in two different flourmills over two consecutive years. was the most commonly trapped beetle during both years in mill 1. In mill 2, (L.) and (Stephens) were both captured in higher numbers than . In mill 1, trap capture was higher overall during Year 2 for most of the species compared with capture during Year 1, likely due to a dust cover modification made for the pitfall trap used in Year 2. Trap capture was also evaluated by location within the mills and a significant difference was found in the capture of during both years in mill 1. captures were significantly reduced following most fumigations, which used methyl bromide in milling areas and phosphine in bulk-stored finished flour. However, in most cases trap catches showed that beetle populations were not eliminated. Trap captures after fumigation suggest either that the fumigations were not entirely effective, or that full grown adult beetles were entering the mill soon after fumigation. When captures of from traps in two spaces of mill 1 during Year 2 were compared with counts of beetles from samples of siftings collected in the finished flour, the correlation coefficients were nearly significant for both sets of traps.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7915626PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects12020144DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trap capture
12
period flourmill
8
years mill
8
finished flour
8
trap
7
mill
6
year
5
capture
5
trapping coleoptera
4
coleoptera tenebrionidae
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!