A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Time Trends in Receipt of Germline Genetic Testing and Results for Women Diagnosed With Breast Cancer or Ovarian Cancer, 2012-2019. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Genetic testing plays a crucial role in managing breast and ovarian cancer, but trends and outcomes related to its usage are not well understood.
  • A study linked cancer patient records from California and Georgia to clinical testing results, revealing that 25.2% of breast cancer and 34.3% of ovarian cancer patients received genetic testing from 2013 to 2017.
  • Despite an increase in testing rates, the proportion of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) results rose significantly, especially among minority groups, indicating a need for improvements in testing practices for better patient outcomes.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Genetic testing is important for breast and ovarian cancer risk reduction and treatment, yet little is known about its evolving use.

Methods: SEER records of women of age ≥ 20 years diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer from 2013 to 2017 in California or Georgia were linked to the results of clinical germline testing through 2019. We measured testing trends, rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), and pathogenic variants (PVs).

Results: One quarter (25.2%) of 187,535 patients with breast cancer and one third (34.3%) of 14,689 patients with ovarian cancer were tested; annually, testing increased by 2%, whereas the number of genes tested increased by 28%. The prevalence of test results by gene category for breast cancer cases in 2017 were PVs 5.2%, and VUS 0.8%; breast cancer-associated genes or ovarian cancer-associated genes ( and ), PVs 3.7%, and VUS 12.0%; other actionable genes ( and ) PVs 0.6%, and VUS 0.5%; and other genes, PVs 0.3%, and VUS 2.6%. For ovarian cancer cases in 2017, the prevalence of test results were , PVs 11.0%, and VUS 0.9%; breast or ovarian genes, PVs 4.0%, and VUS 12.6%; other actionable genes, PVs 0.7%, and VUS 0.4%; and other genes, PVs 0.3%, and VUS 0.6%. VUS rates doubled over time (2013 diagnoses: 11.2%; 2017 diagnoses: 26.8%), particularly for racial or ethnic minorities (47.8% Asian and 46.0% Black, 24.6% non-Hispanic White patients; < .001).

Conclusion: A testing gap persists for patients with ovarian cancer (34.3% tested nearly all recommended), whereas adding more genes widened a racial or ethnic gap in VUS results. Most PVs were in 20 breast cancer-associated genes or ovarian cancer-associated genes; testing other genes yielded mostly VUS. Quality improvement should focus on testing indicated patients rather than adding more genes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8274804PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02785DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ovarian cancer
24
genes pvs
24
cancer-associated genes
16
genes
13
breast cancer
12
breast ovarian
12
vus
12
cancer
9
ovarian
9
pvs
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!