Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: The comparison of the diagnostic efficiency of a reference method (light microscopy [LM] using 10% potassium hydroxide [KOH]) with the use of 100% alcohol to confocal microscopy (IVCM) for the detection of eyelid infestation in seborrheic blepharitis patients.
Methods: Eyelashes were epilated from the right eyes for the reference method and the left eyes for the alcohol group in 58 eyes of 29 patients. IVCM was used on the left eyes. The primary outcomes were the number of mites per lash and the rate of positivity (≥1 mite).
Results: The rate of positivity was similar among the three groups (KOH: 82.8%, alcohol: 86.2%, IVCM: 72.4%; >.05). The mean number of mites per lash in the KOH group (1.5 ± 1.3) was higher than in the alcohol (0.9 ± 0.6, =.041) and IVCM groups (0.9 ± 0.9, =.036).
Conclusion: KOH was found to be superior in terms of the quantification of mites compared to alcohol and IVCM.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2020.1857792 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!